Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Editor's Note Daniel Simon One of the characteristics that binds Indian literatures and begins to define a canon distinct from others is a belief in the primacy and potency of the word and utterance. —Rodney Simard (Cherokee), World Literature Today, Spring 1992 Click for larger view View full resolution PHOTO: ALBA SIMON IN HER GUEST EDITOR'S INTRODUCTION to the "After Alcatraz" issue of WLT, dedicated to literary activism, Allison Hedge Coke refers to the "long lineages of active presence, of resistance, in the long, long continent of the Western Hemisphere" represented by more than 20,000 years of Native inhabitation ("An Active Measure," Autumn 2019). Given the current issue's focus on the Indigenous literatures of the Americas (page 28), the editors wanted to represent as much of this "long, long continent" as possible. Beginning from our base in Oklahoma, the cover feature opens with an interview highlighting the work of Kiowa/Cherokee/Mexican writer Oscar Hokeah. In discussing his acclaimed debut novel, Calling for a Blanket Dance, Hokeah frames it as a "decolonization narrative" while reminding readers that "when we in the United States think of Native Americans, we think of United States Indigenous and Aboriginal peoples in Canada, but Mexico and Central America are filled with Indigenous communities." That decolonial stance is most vividly on display in the emphasis on Native languages throughout the section. 'Ōiwi poet and educator No'u Revilla foregrounds 'ōlelo Hawai'i words and concepts in her essay "How to Swallow a Colonizer," and many of the poems featured here can be read—and listened to—in bi- and trilingual versions either in the print edition or on the WLT website. A case in point is Chelsea T. Hicks's "ie wa ^thakika^ ko^bra i want you to help us talk," her bilingual poem in Osage and English, which is presented in Wahzhazhe ie orthography. Moreover, Hicks's striking photography project of collaborative visual poems called Waleze also graces the cover of the issue and the opening pages of the special section by incorporating Osage-language painted poems in the photographs. The photographs are not just aesthetically beautiful: the final line of the poem by Mary Hammer on the cover of the issue, "No one cries alone with me," encapsulates Hammer's activism as an advocate for Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women. In terms of the broader scope of decolonization, efforts to revitalize Native languages are central to that project. According to the Language Conservancy, "the voices of more than 7,000 languages resound across our planet every moment, but about 2,900 or 41 percent are endangered. At current rates, about 90 percent of all languages will become extinct in the next hundred years" (languageconservancy.org). The most striking visual representation of language loss can be found in a series of maps on the Conservancy's website that depict much of the world in shades of green in 1920, with the United States and Australia conspicuously yellow. Over the course of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, those greens and yellows shade into oranges and reds as boarding schools and government policies, especially in the United States, Canada, and Australia, "aimed to strip peoples" of their languages and, with them, their cultural identity. As Malintzin (La Malinche) and Sacajawea experienced firsthand, "Siempre la lengua fue compañera del imperio" (language was always the handmaiden of empire), in the words of Spanish grammarian Antonio de Nebrija. Undoing empire is also a linguistic project, often a gendered one. In an essay that accompanies her translations and co-translations of a number of Mexican and Guatemalan poets, Wendy Call describes this reclamation project as one of "emancipatory activism." We hope that the sampling of fiction, essays, and poetry included in this issue's cover feature will inspire readers to learn more about the linguistic, cultural, and political stakes embodied in the work of those Native writers presented here—and to seek out many more Indigenous voices from this "long, long continent." [End Page 3] Footnotes I would like to thank my faculty colleagues Kimberly Gail (Méona'hané'e) Wieser-Weryackwe, Tana Fitzpatrick, Carol Rose Little, and Jake Skeets in helping conceptualize...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».