MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4386127823 · doi:10.1136/jech-2023-ssmabstracts.263

OP133 The relationship between food aid interventions and food insecurity, diet quality and mental health in households with children in high-income countries: a systematic review

2023· review· en· W4386127823 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charlotte Stahacz, Nida Ziauddeen, Elizabeth Taylor, Dianna Smith, Nisreen A Alwan

Notice bibliographique

RevueSSM Annual Scientific Meeting · 2023
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychological interventionCINAHLEnvironmental healthPsycINFOMedicineMental healthFood securityDisadvantagedMEDLINEGerontologyNursingGeographyEconomic growthPsychiatryPolitical scienceAgriculture

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> People accessing food aid in high-income countries are often food insecure with a nutritionally inadequate diet. We aimed to systematically review and synthesise studies investigating the relationship between food aid interventions and food insecurity, diet quality and mental health in households with children under 18 years of age in high-income country settings. <h3>Methods</h3> A search was conducted electronically in Web of Science, MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO. Articles published from 1st January 2008 reporting quantitative outcomes, including cross-sectional, cohort and intervention studies in high-income countries were eligible for inclusion. For the purpose of this review, food aid was defined as food banks or other interventions providing free food items by community and/or charitable organisations. This included mobile pantries, home delivery of food parcels and school backpack programmes. Studies where at least some participants were from households with at least one child ≤ 18 years of age were included. The National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Assessment Tool was used to evaluate risk of bias in the included studies. <h3>Results</h3> The search identified 10,394 records, of which 3,414 were duplicates. Abstracts for 278 records were screened leaving 25 papers for full-text screening. Nine papers were included in this review from the USA and Canada. Outcomes assessed were highly heterogenous. A food parcel delivery randomised control trial was rated as good for the quality assessment. Four studies were rated as fair and three as poor due to factors such as convenience sampling and high attrition. Significant improvements in food security were reported by using food banks located in community resource centres providing additional integrated health and social support and with client choice-based models. Diet quality was significantly improved in a food parcel delivery intervention and observed in a cross-sectional study for participants accessing food aid. A non-significant increase of fruit and vegetables was also reported in a mobile pantry with free children’s lunch programme. Only one study observed greater odds of consuming foods with added sugar with higher frequency of food bank use. A small but significant improvement in mental health score was reported between baseline and the end of an 18-month cohort study. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Diet quality was improved by accessing food aid in a few studies. Food insecurity generally remains persistent, with many households relying on food aid in the long term. Providing choice and further social support appears to have greater positive outcomes and should be integrated into current food aid interventions.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,021
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: Revue systématique
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,032
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0210,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,324
Tête enseignante GPT0,497
Écart entre enseignants0,173 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeRevue systématique
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSSM Annual Scientific MeetingMême sujetFood Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsTravaux en français237 207