Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Rumour has it that if armed with the basics of map reading, a keen mind, stout heart, and a pragmatic willingness to follow what appears to be an uninviting trail in the wilds near Creston, British Columbia, one might find Louis A. Knafla hard at work.And while there are undoubtedly manuscripts and volumes to be found somewhere nearby, the labour that engages him now is that of an orchardist, tending to the needs of almost three hundred cherry trees.Admittedly, this might appear to be an odd pastime for an historian whose scholarship has influenced a significant cross-section of Canadian legal history in the course of the past thirty years, to say nothing of his work in the field of English legal history.Yet in its way, the chores that fill Knafla's spring and summer days are very much like those that flavoured those three decades -tilling fields, looking for growth, pruning when necessary, letting other shoots run their course, experimenting with method and approach in one area while drawing upon what has been tried and true in another.Quite literally, Knafla remains, notwithstanding the weather-beaten hat and the dusty visage, a scholar in his field.Anyone who has come to know Lou Knafla would not be surprised to learn that a new project has quickly filled the gap left in the wake of his final lectures in the History Department at the University of Calgary.Indeed, throughout his career Knafla consistently sought out new interests, new topics, and novel approaches, and always encouraged others to do the same.It has been a path charted by a restless mind driven forward by a genuine curiosity about the world in which he lives.And while this inclination, this sense of wonder about a seemingly ever-widening circle of interests has, admittedly, left a few endeavours too long on the vine, he, like many intriguing scholars, resolutely believes that having too much on the go is infinitely preferable to the contrary proposition of finding oneself at the end of things with nothing left to stir one's interests.Indeed, before we lament his retirement from the day-to-day activities of university teaching Prologue: Louis Knafla and Canadian Legal History Jonathan Swaingerviii Jonathan Swainger (along with his much loved committee work), it might be recalled that during the autumn and winter, when the cherry trees are dormant under the snows of British Columbia's southern Interior, Knafla will be back in harness in the Legal Studies Unit at the University of Calgary.Without fail it will be from this new vantage point that he will continue to press onward and, of course, continue to teach, learn, and, with a bit of good fortune, deal with a few of those vines that have trailed on a bit too long.And true to form, he will undoubtedly continue to stake out new lands and return to regions that were first explored in the not so recent past.In fact, one of his most recent essays renewed an interest that has enlivened much of his scholarly labours during these past thirty years: the legal history of Canada.If the truth be told, and despite his departure from the lecture theatre, few of us expect that Knafla's days as a teacher have drawn to a close.For while the body of his scholarship is considerable and has served as an influence upon an entire generation of legal history scholars in Canada and beyond, the case can be made that it will be his work as a teacher and mentor that will be his greatest legacy.His supervisory record with graduate students in early modern English history, along with English and Canadian legal history, has been impressive, and despite having retired, he continues his supervisory obligations for those students who embarked on their studies as Knafla was winding down his active teaching at the University of Calgary.In its own way, this collection reflects Knafla's contributions to mentoring successive generations of graduate students, for it contains essays from four of his graduate students and it is certain that other contributors have also benefited, in some form or other, from Knafla's ability to teach, explain, and elaborate.His contribution to teaching and the exchange of insights has not, of course, been limited to the lecture hall or seminar room.Over the past decades, Knafla was responsible for an institution of sorts, the like of which we may never see again.This, of course, was the much fabled "Knafla Conference."These occasional gatherings eventually assumed proportions approaching that of the touring assize arriving in an English town.The combination of academic endeavour, social function, enormous feasts, and the inevitable hike up some nearby mountain, invitation to try one's hand at roping an uncooperative steer, or a death-defying plunge down a mountain river in an inflatable raft was usually in the offing.Very much like Camp Flaherty at the University of Western Ontario, 1 these gatherings were not just about research and ideas; they were also about forming a community of scholars who would spur each other onwards, share perspectives, and press the inquiry in new and creative directions.Akin to Knafla's approach to teaching and learning, these conferences were always rooted in the notion that everyone in attendance had something to offer and, indeed, something to learn.Established scholars were brought together with those who were starting on academic careers or, just xv
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,019 | 0,009 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,023 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».