Investigation of cyanine‐based infrared dyes as calibrants in radiochromic films
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Radiochromic material such as lithium pentacosa‐10,12‐diynoate (LiPCDA) has been suggested as the radiation‐sensitive material for real‐time in vivo fiber‐optic dosimetry. In this configuration, micron‐thick radiochromic coating would measure the absorbed dose, where a major challenge is the uncertainty in the active material thickness, necessitating calibration. A homogeneously incorporated inert infrared (IR) dye, which must also be stable in ambient conditions and against radiolysis, can be added to the radiochromic film to enable optical calibration. Purpose This study investigates four commercial cyanine‐based dyes (IR‐783, IR‐806, IR‐868, and IR‐880) for use as an optical calibrant in fiber‐optic radiochromic dosimeters. Methods All dyes were dissolved in water to confirm solubility. IR‐783 and IR‐806 were dissolved in 10% w/w gelatin solution and coated onto a polyester substrate, which were then sandwiched between two layers of adhesives forming IR‐783 and IR‐806 films. A second batch of IR dyes in gelatin incorporated the LiPCDA, and was coated onto substrate and sandwiched between adhesive to form IR dye + LiPCDA films. The absorbance spectra of the films were measured periodically (176 and 102 days for IR‐dye films, and IR dye + LiPCDA, respectively). The average percentage absorbance, normalized to day 1, was fit to either a single or a double exponential decay model to calculate the spectral stability lifetime (τ1, τ2). Films were irradiated using a 6 MV LINAC beam with a standard setup of 100 source to axis distance (SAD), 10 cm × 10 cm field size and 1.5 cm depth. The change in absorbance of the IR‐dye + LiPCDA films were measured after they were irradiated to 1, 2, 5, 10, and 20 Gy at 3 Gy/min. Results Only IR‐783 and IR‐806 were sufficiently water soluble. In gelatin matrix, these dyes demonstrated a decrease in absorbance with time for IR‐783 and IR‐806 dyes, with IR‐783 films having an average τ1 = 73 ± 7 days and IR‐806 films τ1 = 7 ± 3 days. When combined with LiPCDA, IR‐806 degraded, losing its original peak at ∼820 nm. Similarly, IR‐783, combined with LiPCDA, showed signs of degradation; however, its original absorbance peak was still observed at ∼800 nm. In the IR‐783 + LiPCDA films, the IR‐783 dye had a τ = 4 ± 1 days, an order of magnitude faster than the IR‐783 with no LiPCDA films. When exposed to x‐ray irradiation, the IR‐783 dye in the IR‐783 + LiPCDA films showed no change in absorbance with increasing absorbed dose. In contrast, the LiPCDA in the films responded as expected, increasing in optical density with increased absorbed dose. Conclusions IR‐783 and IR‐806 dyes were observed to degrade over time following exponential decay curves. IR‐806 could not be combined with the LiPCDA without degrading. The combination of IR‐783 with LiPCDA demonstrated single exponential decay behavior at a comparatively faster rate than films that did not have LiPCDA. IR‐783 was insensitive to ionizing radiation and thus may be suitable for thickness correction, but an alternative manufacturing procedure may need to be developed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».