2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Symposium: Meeting highlights
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meeting, held in Chicago and online from June 2-6, 2023, showcased the latest research in cancer care, with over 200 sessions centered around the theme, "Partnering with patients: The cornerstone of cancer care and research."Following the meeting, on June 8, the Canadian Urological Association (CUA) held an online webinar where Canadian experts highlighted key research findings in kidney, prostate, and bladder cancers.This report provides a summary of the significant advances in genitourinary cancers as presented at ASCO 2023.The full webinar can be accessed on UROpedia Canada, and meeting abstracts are available at the ASCO meeting library. KIDNEY CANCERDr. Naveen Basappa presented an update on the advances in the treatment of kidney cancer.The CheckMate 914 trial investigated the use of adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who were at high risk of relapse after nephrectomy.Surprisingly, the combination treatment did not show any improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) compared to placebo (PBO). 1 To gain a better understanding of the outcomes, exploratory post-hoc analyses were conducted, focusing on specific patient subsets.The results revealed that patients with grade 4 histology, particularly those with sarcomatoid features, showed a potential improvement in DFS with NIVO+IPI.Similarly, patients with over 1% PD-L1 expression seemed to benefit more from NIVO+IPI compared to those with low or no PD-L1 expression.These findings suggest that sarcomatoid features and % PD-L1 expression could serve as a potential biomarker for predicting outcomes in this context.Moreover, NIVO+IPI treatment did not have any detrimental effects on patient quality of life compared to PBO.Another interesting observation was that patients who received more than six cycles of NIVO+IPI tended to have better DFS; however, patients who received six or fewer cycles and discontinued treatment due to adverse events did not experience any DFS benefit.The limited exposure to NIVO+IPI and discontinuation due to adverse events may have contributed to the lack of observed DFS benefit in the trial.Data on overall survival (OS) is still pending. 2Patient selection is crucial in this treatment setting, and in addition to clinical features, biological characteristics should also be considered.Long-term followup of KEYNOTE-426 was presented at the meeting.This trial assessed the efficacy of pembrolizumab (PEMBRO), a PD-1 inhibitor, in combination with axitinib (AXI), a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR TKI), as a first-line treatment for advanced clear-cell (cc)RCC.The first interim analysis demonstrated significant improvements in OS, progressionfree survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) with PEMBRO+AXI compared to sunitinib (SUN), the control arm in the study.After a minimum followup of five years, the 60-month OS rates were 41.9% for PEMBRO+AXI and 37.1% for SUN (hazard ratio [HR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-0.99).Similarly, the 60-month PFS rates were 18.3% and 7.3%, respectively.The median duration of response (DOR) was also longer in the PEMBRO+AXI group.Subsequent anticancer treatments influenced OS, but even after adjusting for this effect, PEMBRO+AXI appeared to show a benefit; however, combination
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,134 | 0,094 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».