MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4386291239 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2023.a905145

Periodical Studies Today: Multidisciplinary Analyses ed. by Jutta Ernst, Dagmar von Hoff, and Oliver Scheiding (review)

2023· article· en· W4386291239 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Solveig C. Robinson

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian periodicals review · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHistorical Influence and Diplomacy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGermanMultidisciplinary approachVariety (cybernetics)Section (typography)PraxisHistoryLibrary scienceArt historyClassicsSociologyPhilosophyComputer scienceSocial scienceEpistemologyArchaeologyArtificial intelligence

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Periodical Studies Today: Multidisciplinary Analyses ed. by Jutta Ernst, Dagmar von Hoff, and Oliver Scheiding Solveig C. Robinson (bio) Jutta Ernst, Dagmar von Hoff, and Oliver Scheiding, eds., Periodical Studies Today: Multidisciplinary Analyses ( Leiden: Brill, 2022), pp. xix + 481, $150 hardcover, open access e-book. Periodical Studies Today: Multidisciplinary Analyses is the first volume in a new series published by Brill, Studies in Periodical Cultures. As noted on the publisher's website, volume 1 "illustrates the shift [in periodicals research] from content-related investigations and archival recovery to multidisciplinary analyses" (https://brill.com/display/title/54179). The contributors employ a wide variety of approaches that consider, for example, how periodicals shape opinions and help readers to form communities, and they explore such varied subjects as editorial networks, material conditions, design, marketing, and consumption. Edited by Jutta Ernst, Dagmar von Hoff, and Oliver Scheiding of Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz (many of the contributors are also from Gutenberg University), Periodical Studies Today contains seventeen chapters arranged into seven sections: "Seriality and Order," "Materiality," "Multimodality," "Translation," "Infrastructure and Agency," "Community," and "Location and Transfer." Each of the sections opens with a short introductory essay by one of the volume editors that defines terms and foregrounds key issues. In essence, these section introductions constitute a primer of theoretical approaches that are then demonstrated in praxis in the ensuing chapters. Each chapter is preceded by an abstract (all abstracts are in English, as are most of the chapters; several chapters are in German). The volume also includes a general introduction, a fairly detailed index of names and subjects, and good-quality color illustrations throughout. A somewhat confusingly titled "Index of Sources" lists the periodicals mentioned in the volume and provides page numbers. The periodicals are mostly British, German, or American, and they span the seventeenth to twenty-first centuries. While there is no general bibliography for the entire volume, the bibliography that accompanies the general introduction is an in-depth and very useful compilation of recent scholarship on the theory of periodicals research, mainly English-language sources but also some German and French ones. Works by members of the Research Society for Victorian Periodicals (RSVP) are, understandably, well represented in the list. The volume's general introduction, "Periodical Studies as a Transepistemic Field," is written by Ernst and Scheiding. Rather than merely providing précis of the chapters, the introduction provides a useful overview of the evolution of periodical studies and highlights the broad range of newer influences on this growing field. Beginning with a nod to Ann Ardis's call for periodicals scholars to better investigate "transnational print media [End Page 139] ecologies," Ernst and Scheiding observe that such an investigation requires a new conceptualization of periodicals, one that sees them "not so much as objects of print culture, but rather as participating in relational and dynamic webs … of socioeconomic conditions, legal and ideological frameworks, institutional organizations, action networks, and communicative environments" (1). The goal, they argue, is to establish a scholarly approach to periodicals that combines these individual epistemic approaches—to create a "transepistemic practice"—and to thereby put historic archives into productive dialogue with contemporary theory (2). After briefly summarizing the first half century of periodicals scholarship, which Ernst and Scheiding characterize as largely descriptive and biographical, the editors move on to describe what they consider to be some of the more promising newer critical approaches, such as actor-network theory, "thick" descriptions of periodicals (drawing from Matthew Philpotts's work), material studies, and studies that explore the "performative aspects" of how, say, readers might navigate periodicals (3–4). They also highlight the value of mobility studies (which focuses on distribution and circulation) and translation studies (4–5). They commend the scholarly work that has developed in tandem with various digitization projects, noting that such scholarship often "moves beyond a consideration of periodicals as containers of information and reassesses them as highly entangled textual-material artifacts" (6). Ernst and Scheiding also acknowledge the expansion of international scholarly associations and publications that have supported and provided venues for the burgeoning field of periodicals research (RSVP and Victorian Periodicals Review both get a nod), and they note the importance such organizations...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,032
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,119
Tête enseignante GPT0,484
Écart entre enseignants0,364 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian periodicals reviewMême sujetHistorical Influence and DiplomacyTravaux en français237 207