<i>Obstetric Medicine</i>, impact factors and publishing
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Obstetric Medicine is indexed in the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) database, which enables visibility of high-quality, peer-reviewed publications even with limited circulation.What is the "Journal Impact Factor"?JIF is defined as the citations in the JCR year to items published in the journal in the previous two years, divided by the total number of citable items (comprising articles and reviews) published in the journal in the previous two years. 1 The calculation of JIF uses as the denominator research and review articles (but not letters or meeting abstracts).For the current JCR year (2022) the Obstetric Medicine IF is 0.7, derived from 103 citations in 2022 from 143 citable items in 2020 to 2021.With the rise in the number of journals published (associated also with some questionable publishing practices), objective metrics are important to identify a journal's reputation.The JIF was designed to create a generalised, journal-level metric showing only a specific type of scholarly use in a single year.While this is important, it may not fully reflect the importance and impact of a journal on the scientific/medical community it serves.As an example, Obstetric Medicine continues to routinely publish interesting case reports, unlike many other journals today.We feel that unusual occurrences in disorders in pregnancy are important information to share.However, case reports are unlikely to be cited (but contribute to the denominator), producing a negative effect on the JIF.Our journal also endeavours to accept articles from a broad spectrum of international authors.We have an international readership and we can all learn from experiences in other medical environments, although some of these articles are not highly cited.For the period 2020/2021, the majority of publications were from the UK (28%), Australia (19%), Canada (17%), India (13%) and USA (8%), but we also published articles from Lebanon, Colombia, South Africa, Norway, Cyprus, Spain, Mexico and Japan.Our most cited articles during this 2020/2021 period highlight the diverse nature of publications in the journal.The top three include a systematic review of the offspring health outcomes of women with antenatal depression, 2 a review on asthma in pregnancy, 3 and a review on the potential maternal health consequences of cellular fetal microchimerism. 4Our most highly cited research articles covered fertility in women with psoriasis, and pregnancy-related inappropriate sinus tachycardia.In the current issue we feature research articles on pregnancy outcomes in autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease, 5 a systematic review of maternal and fetal outcomes in patients with noncirrhotic portal hypertension in pregnancy, 6 and a cohort study of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal mental health screening, illness and pregnancy outcomes. 7 Having hoped for an impact factor for a long time, the next question for us as a journal is whether this now changes anything about our approach to future articles or issues.Should this influence our choice of article or focus
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,240 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».