Quantitative fetal <scp>MRI</scp> with diffusion tensor imaging in cases with ‘short’ corpus callosum
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVES: It has been suggested previously that the presence of Probst bundles (PB) in cases with a short corpus callosum (SCC) on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) may help to differentiate between corpus callosal (CC) dysplasia and a variant of normal CC development. The objectives of this study were to compare DTI parameters between cases of SCC vs normal CC and between cases of SCC with PB (SCC-PB+) vs SCC without PB (SCC-PB-). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients referred to the Necker Hospital in Paris, France, for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of an apparently isolated SCC detected by sonography between November 2016 and December 2022 (IRB: 00011928). MRI was performed using a 1.5-Tesla Signa system. T2-weighted axial and sagittal sequences of the fetal brain were used to measure the length and thickness of the CC. 16-direction DTI axial brain sequences were performed to identify the presence of PB and to generate quantitative imaging parameters (fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)) of the entire CC, genu, body and splenium. Cases in which other associated brain abnormalities were detected on MRI were excluded. Cases were matched for fetal gender and gestational age with controls in a 1:3 ratio. Control cases were normal fetuses included in the LUMIERE on the FETUS trial (NCT04142606) that underwent the same DTI evaluation of the brain. Comparisons between SCC and normal CC cases, and between SCC-PB+ and SCC-PB- cases were performed using ANOVA and adjusted for potential confounders using ANCOVA. RESULTS: Twenty-two SCC cases were included and compared with 66 fetuses with a normal CC. In 10/22 (45.5%) cases of SCC, PB were identified. As expected, dimensions of the CC were significantly smaller in SCC compared with normal CC cases (all P < 0.01). In SCC-PB+ vs SCC-PB- cases, FA values were significantly lower in the entire CC (median, 0.21 (range, 0.19-0.24) vs 0.24 (range, 0.22-0.28); P < 0.01), genu (median, 0.21 (range, 0.15-0.29) vs 0.24 (range, 0.17-0.29); P = 0.04), body (median, 0.21 (range, 0.18-0.23) vs 0.23 (range, 0.21-0.27); P = 0.04) and splenium (median, 0.22 (range, 0.16-0.30) vs 0.25 (range, 0.20-0.29); P = 0.03). ADC values were significantly higher in the entire CC, genu and body in SCC-PB+ vs SCC-PB- cases (all P < 0.05). In SCC-PB+ cases, all FA values were significantly lower, and ADC values in the CC body were significantly higher compared with normal CC cases (all P < 0.05). In SCC-PB- cases, there was no significant difference in FA and ADC compared with normal CC cases (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Fetal DTI evaluation of the CC showed that FA values were significantly lower and ADC values tended to be significantly higher in SCC-PB+ compared with normal CC cases. This may highlight alterations of the white matter microstructure in SCC-PB+. In contrast, isolated SCC-PB- did not demonstrate significant changes in DTI parameters, strengthening the possibility that this is a normal CC variant. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,017 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».