MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4386504778 · doi:10.1515/9781772126716

Rights and the City

2022· book· en· W4386504778 sur OpenAlex
Sandeep Agrawal

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.
aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Alberta Press eBooks · 2022
Typebook
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLaw in Society and Culture
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesGovernment of CanadaSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaUniversity of AlbertaCanada Council for the ArtsFederation for the Humanities and Social SciencesGovernment of Alberta
Mots-clésBusiness

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

rights and the city takes stock of rights struggles and their progress, with a primary focus on Canadian cities.It explores the meaning of people's experiences for the realization of human and other related forms of rights-locally, nationally, and globally.In addition, the project aims to examine the legal, conceptual, and philosophical aspects of rights, including the various forms of rights-human, Indigenous, housing, property, and various others embedded in or encompassing these.This book is unique in its use of empirical evidence and examples to explain rights and to translate the philosophical and legal aspects of rights into more practical terms and applications, such as the application and practice of rights to and in the city.The compilation elicits the constraints and ambiguities that municipal governments face, and some of the progress made when they attempt to combat discriminatory practices, while advancing a human rights agenda.This edited volume has one implicit question that unites all its parts: What is (and what ought to be) the role of municipal governments and planners in regulating, implementing, and advocating rights' claims?It answers the question empirically via legal research or analysis of statutory and case law, or it relies on qualitative case studies.This exploration presents Canada, 2020).They face greater risk because they often work in frontline jobs, live in smaller and more crowded homes, and encounter barriers when accessing health information.Concurrently, homelessness is on the rise in Canadian cities, as witnessed in the dramatic emergence of tent cities since the beginning of the pandemic.Although the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the Charter) and human rights legislation prohibit any form of discrimination in employment, housing, or health care, these legal tools do not offer any specific social and economic rights, such as the rights to housing, health care, social assistance, or work that are guaranteed in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (icescr).However, Canada, as a state, offers a comprehensive social protection and assistance framework in the form of unemployment benefits, social assistance, and health care to every Canadian.Unfortunately, each of these social programs has experienced steady funding cuts and reduction in assistance over the years.This volume adds might to the voices of people who are most affected by today's structural inequality and systemic discrimination, and who are sometimes subject to state violence.It explains how planning instruments were and still are complicit in creating a divisive, segregated city.At the same time, it describes the efforts and progress made, albeit slowly, with some hiccups along the way.In sum, this book is a call to reclaim and rebuild our cities so that they are equitable, diverse, and inclusive. Rights and FreedomsWhile no one definition of rights exists, rights are generally understood to be the fundamental normative rules in a given society for what its people are allowed to do or what they are owed by others, including governing bodies.These rules may be defined by a legal system, social conventions, or ethical theory.By one definition adopted here, rights are institutionally defined rules specifying how people can act with one another; they are upheld by enduring legal protections granted to individual citizens by the liberal-democratic state.They encapsulate two moral and political claims (Donnelly, 2013)-rectitude (righteousness or the right thing to Lately, the two ideas have been increasingly approaching each other: they are often used together, interchangeably, or nested, one within the other.Significant instances that exemplify this trend are recent un documents, such as the New Urban Agenda, a resolution adopted by the un General Assembly (2017), and an earlier policy paper for this agenda (2016).The un policy paper states: "The right to the city encompasses all civil, political, economic, social, cultural, and environmental rights as enshrined in existing international human rights treaties, covenants, and conventions" (unga, 2016, IB).More and more, the right to the city is viewed as the framework in which human rights in the city are specified and developed (Reuter, 2019). 2.According to Mitchell (2003, p. 23), the individual nature of human rights protects the interest of an individual at the expense of others' rights and hence suffers "indeterminacy," "reification," and "political disutility." 3.Kantian imperfect obligation requires the rational being to pursue a policy that admits exceptions, as opposed to perfect obligation that does not allow any exceptions. 4.For Sen, public reasoning involves an open public discussion, which encompasses respect for pluralism and tolerance for different points of view.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,838
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,208
Écart entre enseignants0,193 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle