MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4386523731 · doi:10.1130/b37061.1

On the crumpling and repaving of the North American continent

2023· article· en· W4386523731 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bruce H. Wilkinson, Nicolas Perez Consuegra

Notice bibliographique

RevueGeological Society of America Bulletin · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeologyLithologyOutcropSedimentary rockErosionElevation (ballistics)Tectonic upliftBasementTectonicsSubsidenceGeochemistryPlateau (mathematics)Volcanic rockGeomorphologyVolcanoPaleontology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

At perhaps the coarsest scale of consideration, the rock cycle operates through fluxes associated with tectonic uplift and erosion, which are generally balanced by subsidence/subduction and the burial of mineral materials that leads to volumetric balance among the principal rock reservoirs. At Earth’s surface, net rates of transfer are manifest as the reduction of areas of older rocks during erosional destruction as well as during burial by younger units. Because exposure of continental crust comprises some finite space, decrease of older rock area by erosion and/or burial must be largely balanced by an increase in area of new sedimentary and volcanic successions. Here, we examine relations between the lateral extents of rock units exposed across North America—their lithology, elevation, and the age of formation—to determine rates of geologic “repaving” that are recorded in the age and area of rocks making up the surface of the continent. Moreover, because deposition occurs at lower elevations, one might expect that subsequent episodes of uplift and/or burial would serve to increase the average elevation of currently exposed sedimentary lithosomes. Because plutonic and metamorphic rocks form at depth and are only exposed along orogenic belts and across shields after extended intervals of uplift and/or erosion, one might expect basement rocks to be initially exposed at higher elevations, and that subsequent erosion would decrease elevation with increasing age. Therefore, processes giving rise to associations between outcrop lithology, extent, and elevation may serve as measures of continent-scale rates of rock cycling. We combine data from the 1 arc-minute global relief model with data from the Geological Society of America’s 2005 Geologic Map of North America to assess the actuality and significance of first-order relations among the lithologies, areas, ages, and elevations of rock bodies now exposed across the North American continent and how these may shed light on deep-time rates of rock cycling. Areas of the 23,642 mapped North American lithosomes make up a lognormal frequency distribution (mode = 121 km2). This distribution reflects both natural (lateral extents of individual map units must be limited in space) and anthropogenic (cartographers must render map units within limited range of sizes) causes. Contiguous, lateral associations of the major rock types suggest that the spatial occurrence of volcanic and sedimentary rock bodies is largely independent of the proximity of other rock types, but exposures of plutonic and metamorphic lithosomes are intimately associated in space and thus comprise the “crystalline basement” exposed in cores of younger orogens and across the Canadian Shield. Unlike sedimentary and volcanic rocks that “attain their age” when formed at Earth’s surface, plutonic and metamorphic units are “born” at depth and therefore must have reached some antiquity prior to first exposure. As a result, the ages of volcanic and sedimentary exposures span the full range of ages represented by all lithologies, while those of plutonic and metamorphic suites are more abbreviated and older. Median ages of North American volcanic, sedimentary, plutonic, and metamorphic exposures are 482 Ma, 306 Ma, 1695 Ma, and 2467 Ma, respectively. Although the areal extent of sedimentary rock decreases with increasing age, elevation increases. This change is interpreted as reflecting progressive tectonic uplift from initial accumulation at lower elevations. In contrast, the surfaces of exposed volcanic, plutonic, and metamorphic lithosomes become lower in elevation with increasing age. This change reflects both the erosional lowering of lithosome surfaces as well as the progressive exhumation of larger areas of crystalline basement. Exposed rock area exhibits a power law decrease with increasing age. This change reflects the progressive destruction of older units and their burial by younger units. A simple “repaving” model in which 0.8% area is uplifted and eroded per million years is in good agreement with observed relations of map age versus area, the rate of which is equivalent to the resurfacing of the North American continent every 63 m.y. or ∼56 times over the past 3.5 Ga. The rate of decrease in map area of exposed rocks with increasing age evident in both geologic map data and repaving models is about three times the rate of decrease in total sediment volume as determined from stratigraphic data and repaving models. The decrease in the areas of exposed rock units is primarily the result of burial by younger units rather than erosive destruction.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,968
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,065

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,229
Écart entre enseignants0,209 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGeological Society of America BulletinMême sujetGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchTravaux en français237 207