MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4386565309 · doi:10.1097/01.eem.0000552802.48810.c1

First Person

2019· article· en· W4386565309 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephen S Lim

Notice bibliographique

RevueEmergency Medicine News · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueInnovations in Medical Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMandateMedical educationCurriculumLuckMedical schoolPsychologyPolitical scienceMedicinePublic relationsPedagogyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

foreign medical study: foreign medical studyFigureIt's a long flight to get Down Under. Feels even longer coming home. Canadian by birth. Medical school in Sydney, residency training and first professional attending position in the United States. Now building a family in the Crescent City. It's about the long game—delayed gratification. But this story isn't just about focus and perseverance. It's equal parts luck and determination. None of this mattered when boarding that plane. I was going. The details would work themselves out. Moving to Australia for medical school wasn't a difficult decision. World-ranked universities. First-world living. Multicultural. Progressive problem-based learning curriculum with clinical exposure the first week of the first year. An emphasis on evidenced-based medicine and comprehensive, clinical examination skills. Competitive tuition rates. Residency and fellowship training programs. Even a path to Australian citizenship. But I wasn't planning on staying. I was on a schedule. Australian medical schools aren't feeder programs for Canadian or U.S. residency programs. They have a mandate and responsibility to produce graduates for the Australian medical system. This is right. A full fee-paying international student status doesn't change that reality. They don't owe you time off to study for the MCCEE or USMLE. That's on you. They're not going to place you in a Canadian or U.S. clinical rotation. Start calling and planning. Teaching and examination methodology is fundamentally different—short cases, long cases, essay tests: “Discuss the fundamental components of a comprehensive asthma action plan.” Study for the Australian academic requirements because you cannot fail. Then start working on the medical trivia endemic to the USMLE. Switch and continue. For the next four years. You have benchmarks and deadlines to meet. Score above the mean on the USMLE Steps 1 and 2. Secure an emergency medicine clinical rotation in the United States. Where to apply? Somewhere busy and prestigious. Probably urban and county. Make phone calls and send emails. Lady luck intervenes because the Louisiana State University-New Orleans student clerkship director has never had an Australian medical student rotate with the program and likes the idea. You'll be excited on your first day of your elective. You're finally here. And then you feel totally inadequate because medical students are accessories on Australian hospital treatment teams. You examine for clubbing during a pulmonary physical exam. But how do you order a chest x-ray? Or write a SOAP? What measurement units are they using? Look invisible during shift-change rounds because you don't know which vitamin in excessive quantities causes pseudotumor cerebri. You'll compensate by working harder. Be the first to arrive, the first to volunteer, the last to leave. Learn fast. Apply for the match. How many programs? Every single one. Try not to be disappointed that the majority of programs won't offer you an interview. There are plenty of strong U.S. graduates and they don't want the hassle of sponsoring you for a J1 visa. The strength of your letters of recommendation opens doors that were probably closed to you: “The only reason we invited you here is because of Dr. W's letter.” Endure the grind of secondary screening as you fly one way across the United States post 9/11: New Haven to Tampa, Norfolk to St. Louis, points in between. Probably best that you don't know that only 50 percent of international medical graduates match or that you were one of 11 that year to match in emergency medicine. Lettered agencies and credentials will cast a long shadow over your entire career. USMLE. ECFMG. NRMP. USCIS. J1. H1B. MCCEE. LMCC. RCPSC. Health Canada. ABEM. Successfully navigating through the various bureaucracies should earn you a doctorate. Would knowing any of this have made a difference to you? It might have made you pause. But add it to your reading list. You've got time to work out the details. It's a long flight home. Share this article on Twitter and Facebook. Access the links in EMN by reading this on our website or in our free iPad app, both available at www.EM-News.com. Comments? Write to us at [email protected].

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,179
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1290,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,350
Écart entre enseignants0,312 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEmergency Medicine NewsMême sujetInnovations in Medical EducationTravaux en français237 207