Care Pathways and Initial Engagement in Early Psychosis Intervention Services Among Youths and Young Adults
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Importance: Broad efforts to improve access to early psychosis intervention (EPI) services may not address health disparities in pathways to care and initial engagement in treatment. Objective: To understand factors associated with referral from acute hospital-based settings and initial engagement in EPI services. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used electronic medical record data from all patients aged 16 to 29 years who were referred to a large EPI program between January 2018 and December 2019. Statistical analysis was performed from March 2022 to February 2023. Exposures: Patients self-reported demographic information in a structured questionnaire. The main outcome for the first research question (referral source) was an exposure for the second research question (initial attendance). Main Outcomes and Measures: Rate of EPI referral from acute pathways compared with other referral sources, and rate of attendance at the consultation appointment. Results: The final study population included 999 unique patient referrals. At referral, patients were a mean (SD) age of 22.5 (3.5) years; 654 (65.5%) identified as male, 323 (32.3%) female, and 22 (2.2%) transgender, 2-spirit, nonbinary, do not know, or prefer not to answer; 199 (19.9%) identified as Asian, 176 (17.6%) Black, 384 (38.4%) White, and 167 (16.7%) other racial or ethnic groups, do not know, or prefer not to answer. Participants more likely to be referred to EPI services from inpatient units included those who were older (relative risk ratio [RRR], 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15) and those who identified as Black (RRR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.38-3.22) or belonging to other minoritized racial or ethnic groups (RRR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.14-2.79) compared with White participants. Older patients (RRR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.11-1.22) and those who identified as Black (RRR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.04-2.70) or belonging to other minoritized racial or ethnic groups (RRR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.33-3.36) were more likely to be referred from the emergency department (ED) compared with White participants, whereas participants who identified as female (RRR, 0.51 95% CI, 0.34-.74) had a lower risk of ED referral compared with male participants. Being older (odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00) and referred from the ED (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.27-0.58) were associated with decreased odds of attendance at the consultation appointment. Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of patients referred to EPI services, disparities existed in referral pathways and initial engagement in services. Improving entry into EPI services may help facilitate a key step on the path to recovery among youths and young adults with psychosis.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».