MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4386776949 · doi:10.2979/nsh.2022.a880804

Introduction

2022· article· en· W4386776949 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ruth Roded

Notice bibliographique

RevueNashim A Journal of Jewish Women s Studies & Gender Issues · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésJudaismFeminismIslamFaithReligious studiesSociologyGender studiesAnalogyPhilosophyTheologyEpistemology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Ruth Roded The similar sociologies of Islam and Judaism have given rise to two comparable religious feminist movements since the 1970s.1 They deal with the textual foundations as well as the religious practices of their faith communities. Despite the similarities between Islamic and Jewish religious feminism, there are significant differences between the two movements, such as their global and Middle Eastern manifestations. "Islamic feminism" has been defined as "a feminist discourse and practice articulated within an Islamic paradigm."2 A concise definition, based on the shahada Islamic profession of faith, is "an attempt to reconcile belief in Allah and His Prophet with feminism."3 By analogy, Jewish religious feminism may be defined as "an effort to combine belief in the God of Israel, 'the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob' with feminism."4 These minimalist definitions of Muslim and Jewish beliefs allow us to enlarge the tents of both religions to encompass women of faith with a wide variety of understandings and practices of their religions, without judging who is more authentic than whom. Jewish women who are affiliated with Orthodox Judaism and with the Conservative (called Masorti in Israel, the UK and Europe), Reform (Progressive), Liberal (in France5 and the UK) and Reconstructionist movements are included, as well as believing Muslim and Jewish women who cover their hair and those who choose not to do so. The advent of Jewish religious feminism may be dated to a number of articles published in English in the United States in the early 1970s by women affiliated with different Jewish religious movements,6 mostly of Ashkenazi (central and east European Jewish) descent7—the dominant group in American Judaism at the time. In Israel, the first Orthodox Jewish religious feminists who tried to work with the rabbinic establishment in the 1970s were "Anglo-Saxons," Israelis who had immigrated from English-speaking countries.8 In France, much later, the controversy that followed the first public Torah reading by women in an Orthodox synagogue prompted the founding of a Facebook group, Judaïsme et Féminisme, in 2012. Among the purposes of this group of over 2000 members was the dissemination in French of the latest debates in American and Israeli modern Orthodoxy.9 Islamic feminism seems also to have originated in the 1970s in the United States, where Moroccan sociologist Fatima Mernissi, Lebanese professor of [End Page 7] philosophy and law Azizah Y. al-Hibri, Pakistani immigrant Riffat Hassan, African-American Muslim convert Amina Wadud and Malaysian journalist Zainah Anwar studied or taught. All of these Muslim women came in contact with the secular feminist movement in the United States, and with Christian and Jewish American women who were struggling to reconcile their faith and their feminism. The variegated character of the American Muslim community—consisting of immigrants, students from all over the Muslim world, and Muslims born in the USA10—contributed to the perception that Islam had many faces, not least in matters pertaining to women. The degree of continued contact with their home countries among Muslim women and men in the United States varied as well. The comparative study of Islamic and Jewish religious feminisms faces several challenges. It may require knowledge of the original source languages, Hebrew and Arabic, of the English lingua franca of the religious feminist movements, and of the native languages of the Jewish and Muslim women studied. It necessitates familiarity with varied ethnic and cultural venues, in the United States, Israel, Morocco, France, Pakistan, the United Kingdom, Egypt, Canada and other settings in the far-flung Muslim world. Serious study of Islamic and Jewish religious feminisms requires overcoming stereotypes as well as dealing with extremely sensitive political issues. Nevertheless, some researchers have tackled this daunting task with promising results. The articles in this volume are important contributions to the development of this area of comparative study. Moria Ran and Nahed Ashqar Sharary bring their expertise together to compare feminist religious scholarship among Jewish and Muslim women in Israel. Based on independent but parallel interviews with members of the Jewish Orthodox feminist organization Kolech: The Religious Women's Forum and the Islamic feminist organization Women and Horizons, they reveal insights into internal issues...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,353
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,059
Tête enseignante GPT0,342
Écart entre enseignants0,283 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNashim A Journal of Jewish Women s Studies & Gender IssuesMême sujetJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesTravaux en français237 207