Abstract PO-066: Complete pathological response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence free survival in patients with p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: Locoregionally advanced p16+ squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (OPSCC) is most often treated either with primary chemoradiation (CRT) or surgery followed by adjuvant treatment. Surgery alone is often insufficient treatment as adverse features such as extranodal extension, close or positive margins, lymphovascular invasion, or multiple positive lymph nodes are often identified, resulting in the need for adjuvant radiation or CRT. Primary surgery is often not pursued in more advanced cases since surgical pathology may show adverse features requiring adjuvant CRT, resulting in "triple therapy", the effects of which may worsen risk of long-term treatment toxicity. Our institution has demonstrated excellent oncologic and quality of life outcomes using a neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimen of cisplatin and docetaxel prior to surgical treatment with TORS and neck dissection. Due to high rates of clinical-to-pathologic downstaging, adjuvant treatment is often avoided entirely. Here, we explore whether the development of a complete pathologic (pCR) response following NAC associates with 2-year recurrence free survival. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients receiving neoadjuvant doublet cisplatin and docetaxel followed by surgery (NAC+S) at a single institution between October 2015 and March 2023 was performed and pathologic responses and 2-year recurrence free survival was recorded following IRB exemption. Results: Fifty-four patients with p16+ OPSCC treated with NAC+S were identified. 49 patients (91%) received three cycles of NAC; 5 patients (9%) received two cycles. Comparing clinical staging to pathologic analysis of surgical specimens, 40 of 54 patients (68%) experienced clinical-to-pathologic downstaging after NAC. A pCR was identified in 23 of 54 patients (43%). Of patients that did not develop a pCR, 9 of 31 patients (29%) received adjuvant treatment due to the identification of high-risk pathologic features. Of patients that developed a pCR, 1 of 23 (4%) developed disease relapse within 2 years. Of patients that did not develop a pCR but did not require adjuvant treatment, 2 of 22 (9%) developed disease relapse within 2 years. Of patients that did not develop a pCR but did require adjuvant treatment, 2 of 9 (22%) developed disease relapse within 2 years. A trend toward reduced risk of disease relapse was observed in patients that develop a pCR following NAC compared to those that do not but did not reach statistical significance (1 of 23 relapses with pCR, 4 of 31 relapses without pCR; P>0.05, two-sided Chi-square test). Conclusion: High rates of pCR following NAC were observed in this small retrospective cohort of patients with newly diagnosed p16+ OPSCC despite 84% of patients avoiding any adjuvant treatment. Patients that develop a pCR after NAC trend toward reduced risk of recurrence compared to those that do not. The development of pCR after NAC may be a suitable short-term clinical outcome measure in prospective clinical trials of NAC for patients with newly diagnosed p16+ OPSCC. Citation Format: Alisha R. Pershad, Maxwell Madani, Timothy B. Shaver, Arjun Joshi, Clint T. Allen, Joseph F. Goodman. Complete pathological response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence free survival in patients with p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-AHNS Head and Neck Cancer Conference: Innovating through Basic, Clinical, and Translational Research; 2023 Jul 7-8; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2023;29(18_Suppl):Abstract nr PO-066.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».