Abstract PO-050: Preliminary results from an early-phase, open-label study of tolinapant and radiation in cisplatin-ineligible patients with previously untreated, locally advanced head and neck cancer
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Genomic alterations in NF-kB and inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) pathways are common in head and neck cancer (HNC). IAP antagonists have shown activity in HNC, especially when paired with radiation therapy (RT), in both preclinical and early clinical studies. Our preclinical studies suggest that the combination of tolinapant and RT works in part by enhancing T cell activation, dendritic cell maturation, immunogenic cell death, and other aspects of the anti-tumor immune response. However, the safety and efficacy of IAPi combined with definitive RT, without platinum chemotherapy, has not been explored clinically. Methods: This is an open-label, early-phase study to determine the safety of the IAPi tolinapant combined with definitive or adjuvant RT. Eligible patients have previously untreated, locally advanced HNC, ECOG ≤1, with plan for definitive or adjuvant RT but are ineligible for treatment with cisplatin. Patients are treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or proton therapy (IMPT) to 60-70 Gy with tolinapant 180 mg (the single-agent recommended phase 2 dose) daily by mouth or feeding tube for 7 days during weeks 1, 3, 5, and 7 of RT, with the option of tolinapant dose reduction to 90 mg daily for toxicity. In the adjuvant setting, patients are treated for 6 weeks with 3 cycles of tolinapant. Blood is collected for research at baseline and during weeks 2 and 7. Tissue biopsies at baseline and during week 2 are optional. Results: Eight patients have been consented, including 3 screen failures and 5 enrolled (accrual target = 10 enrolled). All enrolled patients to date received definitive RT; four patients were treated with IMPT. Tumor sites included nasopharynx (1), oropharynx (one HPV+, one HPV-), and larynx (2). The most common reason for cisplatin ineligibility was hearing loss. The median age was 70 (range, 64-81). One patient had a grade 2 rash with pruritis that persisted for several weeks after treatment; other AEs included one treatment interruption during week 1, attributed to RT. Dose reduction of tolinapant was not required for any patients. Three patients have been evaluated by imaging and clinical exam 3 months after treatment, with no evidence of residual disease. Flow cytometry of peripheral blood samples showed a decrease in the proportion of CD4+CD25+ T cells (3/5 patients) and increase of differentiation markers on CD8+ T cells (4/5 patients) from baseline to week 2; these trends were more pronounced at week 7. The one patient who experienced a persistent grade 2 rash with pruritis had a >10-fold increase in activated (HLA-DR+CD38+) CD8+ T cells by week 7. Conclusions: Based on preliminary safety and tolerability data reviewed at this interim analysis, tolinapant at 180 mg appears to be a safe dose for combination with definitive RT. Additional studies will further characterize the dynamics of the peripheral immune response and provide longer follow up on a larger cohort of patients. This study was supported by Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. with a research grant to NCS and NFS. Citation Format: Nicole C. Schmitt, William A. Stokes, James E. Bates, Madison Stallings, Brendan L. C. Kinney, Mark W. McDonald, Soumon Rudra, Jill Remick, Zachary S. Buchwald, Dong M. Shin, Azeem S. Kaka, Mihir R. Patel, Nabil F. Saba. Preliminary results from an early-phase, open-label study of tolinapant and radiation in cisplatin-ineligible patients with previously untreated, locally advanced head and neck cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-AHNS Head and Neck Cancer Conference: Innovating through Basic, Clinical, and Translational Research; 2023 Jul 7-8; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2023;29(18_Suppl):Abstract nr PO-050.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».