MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4386905700 · doi:10.5406/26396025.4.2.02

Trans Women Are Women, and Sport Is a Human Right

2023· article· en· W4386905700 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Veronica Ivy

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Olympic Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueDoping in Sports
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNothingIrrational numberFace (sociological concept)PsychologySocial psychologyEpistemologySociologyPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I'm really tired of repeating myself. People keep telling me that the topic of including trans and/or intersex women in women's sport is “complicated.” But it's not. It's very simple. Are trans women really women, full stop, or not? If you think “Yes,” then there's no debate: trans and intersex women, as women, belong in women's sport. If you think “No,” then there's absolutely nothing I can say that will change your mind. You didn't arrive at that belief through reasoning, and you won't get out of it that way either. It's a little like arguing with a flat-Earther: if you are convinced that the Earth is flat, then you'll find any reason, no matter how irrational, to hold on to that belief in the face of overwhelming evidence.But this is what I find myself repeating over and over: to those who already think that trans and intersex women are really, fully women, I don't need to provide further evidence. So, I find myself arguing against people who already think that trans and intersex women are “male” and therefore there must be some unfair performance advantage, despite my repeatedly pointing out that there's no reliable scientific evidence supporting their claim. It often doesn't take much to scratch the surface of their views to find that they really just think that trans women are men in dresses. In fact, the best evidence we have suggests that trans women, in particular, are grossly statistically underrepresented in elite sport; it seems, instead, then that trans women are possibly at a competitive disadvantage compared to their cis counterparts.I've penned peer-reviewed scholarly articles on trans and intersex athlete rights to inclusion.1 I've presented detailed arguments about the science, law, and ethics (particularly regarding sport as a human right). I've penned articles and op-eds for such major news outlets as the New York Times, the Washington Post, and The Economist, and so many others I've literally lost count. I've appeared on all major news networks, including going into the “lion's den” of Fox News's New York headquarters to go toe-to-toe with someone I think I'm safe in calling transphobic, Abigail Shrier. I've appeared in more documentaries than I can even enumerate.Each time I say the same thing: sport is a human right (just read the first sentence of the International Olympic Committee's fourth Fundamental Principle of Olympism: “Participation in sport is a human right.”) and the burden of proof is on those seeking to exclude a group from a human right. That's how human rights law works. And it's very clear that those seeking to exclude trans and intersex women from women's sport have not met that burden. In fact, I've argued in print that I think it's unlikely that they'll ever be able to meet that burden.But it's like arguing with a wall. You see, the “common sense” position is that trans women are “male” and that they must—even though no evidence supports this—retain an unfair advantage, so the burden of proof is really on trans and intersex women to show that they don't have an unfair advantage. Society has it exactly backwards.I'm routinely asked to “debate” with a transphobe about my basic human dignity, where they call me a man, male, a cheater (see Martina Navratilova's op-ed in the Sunday Times).2 I knock down every one of their arguments every time, but still the “narrative” is that despite the lack of evidence, isn't it obvious that trans women have an unfair advantage due to being “male”? So, I repeat myself. I'm tired of it. I'm tired.In 2019, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) undertook a consultation process with various stakeholders on updating their 2015 “IOC Consensus Meeting on Sex Reassignment and Hyperandrogenism” recommendations.3 These consultations involved day-long meetings at the IOC headquarters in Lausanne, Switzerland, with IOC personnel and trans athletes, and another round for intersex athletes. I was part of the trans athlete consultations. It was mere weeks after I won my second UCI Masters Track Cycling World Championship in Manchester, England.The history of IOC guidelines around trans and intersex women athletes (trans men are usually an afterthought and non-binary athletes are often not even considered at all) has been one of increasing inclusion. In their 2003 consensus meeting, the IOC recommended requiring trans athletes to undergo unnecessary genital surgery (genitals don't play sports!) and then a two-year waiting period to compete in their transitioned gender.4 In 2015, they removed the surgery requirement, recognizing how unnecessary and discriminatory it is (do you even know how expensive genital reconstruction surgery is?!), and recommended instead twelve months (and perpetual thereafter) testosterone suppression below 10nmol/L.5It's worth noting that the 10 nmol/L value was chosen pretty arbitrarily (despite what they will tell you). It wrongly believed that 10 nmol/L was the bottom of the “normal” male range. The problem is that the male range of unaltered endogenous testosterone goes down to next to nothing, well below the average for cis women. Part of this is that such recommendations require rigging the concept of “normal” to exclude all the cases that invalidate the claim. As I commonly say, “Sure, there's no endogenous testosterone overlap between male and female if you ignore all the cases of overlap!”Since international sport federations (IFs) started allowing trans people to compete in their transitioned gender for the 2004 Athens Olympics, until, but not including, the 2021 Tokyo Olympics, there were over 54,000 Olympians. The number of trans athletes? Zero. Under the more inclusive 2015 update to the IOC transgender recommendation, which many IFs adopted for the 2016 Rio Olympics, the number of Olympians for 2016 Rio and 2018 Sochi, was over 14,000. Much of the news reporting around the 2015 updated IOC recommendation was that trans women would take over and dominate at Rio. How many trans athletes actually participated? Again zero.Even in Tokyo 2021, depending on how one counts, four trans people participated (one did not actually compete as she was an alternate), but no trans woman medaled. The only trans person to medal was Quinn, who is a non-binary member of the Canadian women's soccer team—they won gold.6Every single time people make the fear-mongering claim that trans women will “take over” or “dominate” women's sport, it's not borne out by reality. A trans woman has never won an elite (open) world championship, none hold an elite (open) world record, none have won an Olympic medal, and none have won any major tournament in sports like golf and tennis. This is an irrational fear of trans women. And what do we call that? Transphobia.It's important to call it what it is. Too many “well meaning” people are afraid of using that word for fear, I guess, of alienating people or being “divisive.” You know what's divisive? Making up fantasies about trans women dominating women's sport—despite all evidence to the contrary—and using that fear to deny trans women their basic human right to compete as the women they are.I never wanted to be an “activist” for athlete rights. Truly, I just wanted to race my bike and see how far I could advance in the sport I love. So far, this has led to two UCI Masters Track Cycling World Championships in 2018 and 2019. I used to have Olympic aspirations until the trauma causing PTSD and on by an to It's to such but it's a people are they can to you from even every the of still call me a just for are a of arguments being about on it's for trans women to compete in women's sport. is often lost in the is that there are trans men athletes and non-binary athletes. are the trans men I've read that more than I can count. But the trans athletes have been trans a the Rio 2016 has a in And the first trans person to an Olympic medal, Quinn, did so at Tokyo 2021 with the Canadian women's soccer a trans male who to for being to in the is all often used as an of what's with trans women in sport. was on the in on people to trans women in sport think that a trans men are often but then are from the they don't the that only on trans women in sport. In some like with used as against trans women, in of what can at best be trans men at some and for their is an in and athletes are out is often not to non-binary If one isn't into the where one require an athlete to and they then change their for four any World will not a trans athlete to compete in the women's if they in the male four The athlete must provide a and that she has not the in the male of an in or or one of sports of or absolutely no for This is a for any elite trans women who to compete in of sport from on from the IOC and the of sport the of for In a 2015 about intersex female the in are only two of male and These are to all athletes who to in competitive The is the for sport. And even though their do not for their fact, their in was a from their in their or even what IFs In this athletes to compete in international sport the only do so in the “male” or is that there is at some between and So, one I'm between using or which are often as and which are often as The is sport not make any between and they are used In the the the in that some women from at all is to the of that must have the of sport, of any do not make any between and at not trans people are not able to of their they are able to in many The the and a of have of allowing trans people to change the on their including their In for a trans woman can be as As of twelve or in can have the on their therefore all of their any or even a is a is no between being and require of trans people to this and there can be at the and are many the of the 2004 a full gender is to a the gender for all the gender if the gender is the male the that of a if it is the female the that of a the of and that of a The and are used in and only or or their or doesn't say or The that sport or such as are on the of and not on a between and is not the the that sport and do not make a between and this people who trans women's in women's sport are to that trans women are women in of gender but in their that trans women are female in of The is that we sport on the of and trans women be women, they are not female and be into sports is to call to the lack of any such in at the Olympic and in So those who to for trans women's on the that they think that sport is on the of it for to and in the Olympic the IOC various to an athlete was male or of their this only ever to those seeking to compete in the women's never men and those in the sport is the And in the an athlete to be was to women of of were by women's be to a who would than a was evidence that the athlete was not a and so the athlete would be from genital was to be so the IOC the of they the which for the of a The of a a of the and the female athlete would be and from time, as scientific of the of intersex cases are not that people into and are around and but there are many including and some people have which much of the person to some people have where their male of their testosterone are to the and this the person to the IOC in of athletes at the Olympic in and the in and in the 2015 all are are no in the of an athlete is male or the between male and female is a matter of a person is female is a matter of are to an If a trans say then she is really who trans women's in sport say that trans women are not but they have no can all they it doesn't change the an In many trans women are the first of from those who trans women's in women's sport is that sport isn't about it's about And they that a trans woman is a they deny that she is But sport and make no such second of is that trans women are not female and be from sport. But the IOC down and all sports the of the an they not have their And trans women can be as they are really female for the of my of over the are the arguments of those trans women's in women's sport. And any some have at a little to their this and have transitioned into what is the used against trans women's in performance I to this is rights to compete are not on that there isn't a competitive advantage. a is literally people who trans women's can and the need for they'll But that will never for they'll to of evidence even in the of any scientific evidence such a so far is the claim that trans women have by which people that trans women's endogenous This isn't a this matter is the human rights at the that sport is a human right. this “debate” about trans women in sport as trans women's rights against women's rights in a of of rights. But I'm to tell you that there is no of rights. rights are not like rights to trans women not take any from cis is a human right. a the Olympic Fundamental of The fourth of sport is a human That's the first full And they competitive the IOC is only with competitive sport. is no right to in sport; there is no right to make a in sport. The right is to and to to to make the to for your best in the Olympic of and of women do not have a right to exclude women they don't like or don't and have a history of women of often on same of competitive advantage or not But are not rights. the right for trans and intersex women to compete in sport with women is not in with rights. make up rights and claim a are but often in law or These rights that people claim are in with trans women's in sport don't in any or that convinced that in sport is a human right. And that convinced that trans women are and belong in women's sport. You still to trans women's on the of some of and unfair competitive that you think trans women This is the human rights is what the not scientific evidence we to allowing to from the The IOC is an international as is the they of this into the of international human rights law and are often the of and the of on The and the IOC are in Switzerland, which require the of against women on the of are This isn't to say that is never can be a to the between or In only to the or of But international human rights for we can what is a the must be in of a have and the right to of on the that so is in of the of can about this is but the first is to that are in of a In sport, are in of the of This first is a very to have to over it to the must be for the of the If we can the human then we can only be in human rights if so is for a the is not for and this second is trans women from women's sport is for in on that the must be at the if a discriminatory be for a if it isn't at then it to be A for the is to evidence suggests that the is not at such And there are of someone from the is and so is not the from the must be to the to the group or against by the that against already or even if they are and in of a will to be to the of a group will not the is not a a group can at the of a another is the to trans women by from women's sport is to any to women. on that an the a calling on the for human rights to into discriminatory in sport, including on endogenous testosterone in women, calling out World then still as the International of by The in that discriminatory and that require women and athletes with of and of testosterone to their testosterone international human rights and including the right to and the right to the of and the right to and the right to and to the of just and of the right to the right to from and or and and full for the dignity, and of the to the international human rights with that the for the female by the International of that into on 2018 are not with international human rights and including the rights of women with of and at the of and evidence for the to the that they not be and and that there is no clear of between the of the and the and their about sport being a human right is that the position is inclusion. The is not trans women until we have more evidence about there not being a competitive the must be trans women we have evidence to in an international human rights In my I that the will never we much competitive on the of than what could ever be possibly to unaltered endogenous is the human rights this The of sport is a human right is a matter of and trans women can be as trans women have a human right to in competitive sport as women, as women don't have to inclusion. The burden of is on those who to exclude as that burden has not been and is unlikely ever to be to exclude a group of people on an competitive advantage, as just such a would need to be in of a and at that and the to to the by the on every that the are at in of the of in But as I the for that is so have to over it to much advantage do trans women have in I'm to it doesn't It really for the of that there is an of the gender performance where we see an between and women's just even though I think it's for the of that trans women are with cis are going to even though I think it's is even if we this is not to the of trans women from women's will but isn't this we have and women's we sport men are and The history of and women from sport to Olympic is not men are women were to the Olympic in there was no women's to the Olympic in there was no women's in the or any than into the in the to The to by race only to be by and she was to the was to the of the race by asked women were not to compete in the Olympics, the do not of the of women in In the Olympic their be to the that with would be and of the IOC headquarters for the consultation I was to take a with a over which is on the I fourth of the the Olympic in the sports was not (just like still A won the In the Olympic the IOC the and did not a women's for the in which she won The was from The women's world is not to compete for the world and a of sports are with no of are or were there's an advantage that men have over women. This isn't sport is and the world over were and to be women to but we sport. have no this is all is that even if we that men are than women, and we that trans women are with cis trans women is not in an international human rights is like are than are many women who are than many These instead, are the average is than the average or the best is than the best are But the men and women. The is often the same as the and women athletes are than the average cis man, and the average trans The average of the Rio 2016 women's was The woman in the is the is and was the in the The average for men is around is not around the The average woman is the average woman is in sport and call that So even if we say that the average trans woman is than the average cis we already much women's sport and call it This is for any one including endogenous And there's no evidence of a between unaltered endogenous testosterone and my is that even if there it's to trans competitive women's sport that are far than not require that no athlete have a competitive advantage over In fact, the of and so And not require to exclude those who have performance women athletes to dominate their sport, like or that is often not some that they are trans women is often a of with women of being to such where this The claim is that trans women are like cis and cis men have a performance advantage over women. If we that this is it's not to trans women. a in of the of in is not for we even women's sport. It be It's two of the to a discriminatory an international human rights trans women are a and trans women of and trans women of from the And the to of discriminatory that further an already group not to be trans women the trans women is not an international human rights which the in sport as a human right is And the competitive women's sport we I think that it's unlikely that any evidence will ever change The is not don't need or in to to what is human the right to in competitive the scientific evidence is that competitive advantage that could ever be to be to trans women will be for an to be and at in sport, the competitive we already in women's sport. The human rights is the one that this And there is no there was another in 2021 the IOC their on and on the of and Sex which was the of the consultations I was involved in in the is even more and inclusive than their 2015 consensus it has the of it clear to IFs that the IOC has never a on trans the IFs to make up their and that the IOC will have nothing to say about full trans even a of evidence. The IOC doesn't to in telling IFs how to their The is not actually an IOC the IOC the IFs at the Olympics, the of So, the World trans was at the 2021 Tokyo has a number of IFs to to trans they adopted the 2015 IOC consensus it for a And in the none of federations has an of trans women dominating But trans women after a trans woman won a single I though she was Olympic In fact, the person with the in the won are all by World has trans women for four if they to compete in the male to not on any scientific part of World consultation I this you have a trans there any with you have any trans women international what's the do you need to change the to be more the IOC we need to have But you have a trans right And there are no with So do you need to change the IOC we need to have this it's not to and just what I I say it's like to a wall. These people that there's no to and that to for trans women out of It's an irrational fear, which it trans women are trans women are But sport and the cis men who to this reality. In one trans woman against for discriminatory trans we find a from of the in important In a to know this to but in the of the people we are with and are this we say, a they find this it is their belief that they it like to we can make on this if we the right and are in all to not to be discriminatory just by In a to the about going down the that with that they really are women and that their is This that some including if it with for believed they was an to discriminatory and at the very that is really a woman (and down the that with that they are right is to see sport federations their as it did with the and even sport federations like are seeking to or trans women's in women's sport they think it's “common sense” that trans women women, really what this “debate” is really are trans women really women, or not? If then there's no If then I'm but just can arbitrarily group women in to find all women are about on than women, and we women to compete against women and call that And there be between the average trans and cis woman will be far than the range of the of

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,381
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,406

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,051
Tête enseignante GPT0,361
Écart entre enseignants0,310 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Olympic StudiesMême sujetDoping in SportsTravaux en français237 207