Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Potential competing interests: No potential competing interests to declare.The last thing women who struggle with infertility need is yet another male author telling them their only chance of having a baby reinforces patriarchy.Infertility is a disease and I find the argument that ARTs reinforce patriarchy weak.The author should reconsider his argument.In fact it is well known that infertile women living in patriarchal societird suffer great ostracism, social and family pressures to produce offspring especially male offspring.What is wrong with Assisted reproductive technologies in terms of democratizing access to them is the prohibitive cost for many people in countries or provinces or states where insurances do not cover costs and even in countries where 1 IVF cycle is funded more cycles are needed for successful live birth.In some cases people can spend thousands of dollars or tens of thousands of dollars until they achieve a live birth because these technologies do not guarantee anything and it takes several tries to be successful.The author argues that preference for biological parenthood is problematic.That is for each individual to decide what type of parenthood they prefer.If an LGBT couple wants biological ties with their offspring why is that problematic?In certain countries LGBT people cannot legally adopt, in other countries adoption is difficult because not enough people are in the system, for example in the province where I live Saskatchewan a law was passed for indigenous children in the system to rightfully be placed with indigenous communities first.This however has created a vacuum in the local adoption system and there are currently no children to adopt (with wait lists of many years), therefore the only way to adopt for nonindigenous couples is international adoption which also carries costs.For these couples maybe IVF is an answer especially if they suffer from infertility, but such treatments can help them.The author also argues that biological parenthood reinforces patriarchy.For millions of mothers who are having children these days and for fathers that help out with baby care this is a problematic argument.According to the author one should no longer have biological children because it reinforces patriarchy.If fathers would help out with baby care, bottle feeding and other household tasks that would not be the case, and many fathers these days do step up.If the author thinks breastfeeding reinforces patriarchy probably the author has not heard of pumping which allows the mother to extract the milk so that other household members for instance the father can feed the baby.It's most used to keep up milk supply for instance in the US by women who go back to work after 2-3 months because of short maternity leave but who want to continue feeding the baby breastmilk.Also, formula feeding is quite acceptable these days and many women do not breastfeed.Less and less women stay at home.This argument is also outdated.In many countries for instance former socialist countries in Eastern Europe mothers have always gone back to work after giving birth.They now have access to
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,027 | 0,144 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,084 | 0,029 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».