41 Evaluating Immunization Status and Barriers to Immunization for Patients Admitted to the Stollery Children's Hospital
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction/Background Routine immunization is an effective public health intervention. Despite this, immunization coverage in Alberta remains below national targets. While vaccine hesitancy is a frequently cited barrier, underimmunization is likely multifactorial. Previous research has shown that hospitalization presents an opportunity to “catch-up” children who are underimmunized. Unfortunately, this is not readily available at the Stollery Children’s Hospital (SCH), a paediatric tertiary care facility serving a large catchment area. Objectives The primary objective of this study was to assess the immunization status of children admitted to paediatric clinical teaching units (CTUs) at SCH. Our secondary objective was to assess potential barriers caregivers face while attempting to immunize their children. Design/Methods Between July 2021 and October 2022, we prospectively gathered the immunization status of children aged 2 months to 18 years admitted to paediatric clinical teaching units (CTUs) at SCH. Two hundred and fifty children and their caregivers were enrolled in the research study. Demographic data and immunization records were documented, and immunization status of each participant was classified as up-to-date or not-up-to-date based on the Alberta Routine Childhood Immunization Schedule. Caregivers completed a standardized survey, Searching for Hardships and Obstacles to Shots (SHOTS), to assess potential barriers they face while attempting to immunize their children, including three subscales (access to shots, concerns about shots and importance of shots). Results Of the 250 children enrolled, immunization data was available for 240 children. Of these, 142 (59%) were up-to-date on their immunizations. Assessment of demographic data revealed no difference in immunization status between urban and rural addresses. When evaluating barriers that families face when approaching immunization, concerns about immunization were most commonly cited as barriers for all patients. However, caregivers whose children were not up-to-date on immunizations scored higher on all subscales compared to those whose children were up-to-date. Conclusion The immunization status of children admitted to paediatric CTUs at SCH falls far below national targets. Due to logistical issues, it is challenging to access routine immunizations during hospitalization. Caregivers of children who are underimmunized also identify a higher rate of barriers to immunization. These underimmunized patients represent a missed opportunity, and improving access to routine immunization while in hospital could improve the overall immunization rates for both hospitalized children and the broader community.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».