78 Nitrous Oxide Use for Children Experiencing Painful Procedures: A Survey of Canadian Paediatric Emergency Physicians’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Nitrous oxide (N2O) is an inhaled analgesic/anxiolytic gas with ample evidence supporting its safety and efficacy in children. However, its prevalence of use remains low, while its indications in paediatric emergency departments (EDs) across Canada remain unknown. Optimization of safe and appropriate of N2O use in this setting requires an understanding of paediatric emergency providers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practice patterns surrounding its use. Objectives We aimed to characterize physicians’ perceptions and current site-specific processes and procedures surrounding N2O use to understand differences between current evidence and clinical practice and standardize care for children undergoing distressing procedures. Design/Methods This cross-sectional survey was distributed electronically to all physician members of Paediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC) from February to April 2021. Survey items pertained to N2O availability, comfort with N2O use, and perceived barriers/facilitators to its use. Further, a PERC representative from each site completed a site-specific inventory of N2O policies and procedures. Results Response rate was 67.8% (156/230), with 53.2% (83/156) women; 66.6% (104/156) had paediatric emergency subspecialty training, and mean clinical experience was 14.7 years (SD 8.6). 40.0% (6/15) of sites had N2O available in the ED, and 83.3% (5/6) of these institutions had written policies and/or procedures in place for N2O use in the ED. Overall, 48.7% (76/156) of physicians reported using N2O in their clinical practice. The most common indications for use were fracture/dislocation reduction (69.7%, 53/76), wound closure (60.5%, 46/76), and incision and drainage (59.2%, 45/76). The most common perceived barriers to N2O included concerns about ventilation/scavenging systems (71.2%, 57/80) and unfamiliarity with equipment (52.5%, 42/80). The most common perceived facilitators were N2O availability in the ED (73.0%, 114/156) and clinical experience with N2O (71.7%, 112/156). Of the 51.3% (80/156) physicians who reported not using N2O, 93.7% (75/80) did not have access available at their site; notably, 77.3% (58/75) indicated a desire to have access to N2O. Conclusion Despite evidence to support its use, only half of paediatric emergency physicians in Canada currently use N2O as a tool for treating children’s procedure-related pain and distress. Increasing availability of necessary equipment, protocols, and clinical training surrounding N2O use in children may improve clinicians’ abilities to better manage children’s acute pain and distress in the ED, and other clinical contexts.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».