21 Cross-sectoral Care for Transitional Aged Youth (TAY) with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Intellectual Disabilities (ASD/IDD)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background The Transition Clinic for Youth and Young Adults (TAY clinic) with ASD/IDD is a unique partnership between the Developmental Sector and Health care sector. Surrey Place Centre, St. Michaels Family Health Teams and Developmental Paediatrics work with families of adolescents and young adults ages 14-22 to help transition from paediatrics-based healthcare and developmental services to adult sectors using a structured approach to transition. This clinic was a pilot project over the past 5 years, and we are using a mix-methods study to evaluate the implementation of the clinic and its impact on the lives of TAY with IDD and their caregivers. Objectives To describe patient and caregiver characteristics, usage of clinic, transition goals stated and achieved, and level of support needed. Design/Methods Quantitative data was collected using standardized forms including demographics, transition planning goals, and dates of applications to critical services like Developmental Service Ontario and Ontario Disability Support Program. The frequency, intensity and duration of transition planning support provided in the clinic was documented, as well as involvement of crisis services, child protection services, networks of specialized care, and hospital admissions. Results To date, 94 families have been supported through this clinic, with notable differences in the intensity and type of services required. Families were evenly distributed across three levels of transitional support need: (1) required consultation only; (2) required short-term intervention and follow up from the team with future crisis planning; and (3) families with extreme complexity, disconnected from the developmental sector and requiring intensive support and, at times, crisis care. In this 3rd group, 30% were regular emergency and crisis service users because of significant risk of harm or death to client or caregiver associated with physical or mental health concerns, and 15% were at risk of homelessness. Barriers to social determinants of health (e.g., housing, food security, social support) and inequities (based on race, immigration status, employment, English language proficiency) were present in all cases. Across all 3 groups, trajectories within the current systems of care were often apparent years before their transition. Conclusion Cross-sector models of care are feasible for TAY with IDD. This model of care identified different levels of need for TAY with IDD. Barriers to transition support are rooted in inequities and are often present years prior to transition. Paediatricians can help with earlier identification of families who require and deserve more comprehensive support.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».