R2 (Resident Advocacy Project) Reducing the Risk of ATV-related Harm in Saskatchewan Children
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Rationale and Objectives All-terrain vehicles (ATVs) are the second highest cause of transport-related hospitalizations, emergency room visits, and disabilities in Saskatchewan citizens of all ages. Saskatchewan law restricts the use of ATVs by children aged 12-16 and bans the use of ATVs by children under the age of 12 on public land. Previous CPS status reports had found this level of legislation inadequate. Clinically, we certainly see many children enter Saskatchewan hospitals for ATV-related injuries, and previous attempts at education campaigns and government lobbying have not been successful. There is limited Saskatchewan information on this issue, so we first sought to gather data to identify where social and legislative advocacy efforts should be directed. Project Description We partnered with the Saskatchewan Prevention Institute, a non-profit organization working to prevent injuries in children, as they have worked on ATV safety over the years with community partners as well as government. We completed a retrospective chart review to describe the prevalence and outcomes of ATV accidents in children and youth (aged 20 and under) presenting to hospitals in Saskatoon from 2016 to 2021. Armed with this data, we will be able to improve education campaigns as well as share information with key stakeholders, and hopefully effect change. Outcomes During the study period, 354 children presented to hospital after an ATV accident (most aged 12-16 years). Over 90% of children using dirt-bikes were wearing a helmet compared to 48% of children using four-wheeled ATVs (quads, side-by-sides, and other ATVs). Accidents involving quads resulted in an average hospital stay of 10 days, compared to 2 days for cases involving dirt-bikes. Finally, the type of injury was significantly associated with the patient’s health region of residence. For example, children living in the North and Far North Saskatchewan accounted for the highest proportion of moderate/severe head injuries (76.19%) and polytraumas (50%). Discussion/Future Directions This data suggests that there is a potential knowledge gap in public knowledge regarding the risks of children using ATVs; that there may be barriers to helmet use; and, most strikingly, that there is a disproportionate number of severe injuries occurring in northern Saskatchewan. New public education initiatives are now in development based on these findings. There are many stakeholders to consider, and we are aiming to share our data so that evidence-based policy decisions can be made. We are currently drafting a letter to relevant ministries, and hope to have more progress to share in the near future.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,017 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».