Functional Brain Network Alterations in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus With Different Cognitive Function States: A Graph Theory Analysis Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate the characteristics of brain functional network disruption in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with different cognitive function states by using graph theory analysis and to explore their relationship with clinical data and neuropsychiatric scales. METHODS: Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data were collected from 38 female SLE patients and 44 healthy controls. Based on Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, SLE patients were divided into a high MoCA group (MoCA-H; MoCA score, ≥26) and a low MoCA group (MoCA-L; MoCA score, <26). The matrix of resting-state functional brain networks of subjects in the 3 groups was constructed by using the graph theory approach. The topological properties of the functional brain networks, including global and local metrics, in the 3 groups were calculated. The differences in the topological properties of networks between the 3 groups were compared. In addition, Spearman correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between altered topological properties of brain networks and clinical indicators, as well as neuropsychiatric scales in SLE patients in the MoCA-L group. RESULTS: At the global level, in the sparsity threshold range of 0.10 to 0.34, the values of small-world properties were greater than 1 in all 3 groups, indicating that functional brain networks of both 3 groups had small-world properties. There were statistically significant differences in the characteristic path length, global, and local efficiency between 3 groups ( F = 3.825, P = 0.0260; F = 3.722, P = 0.0285; and F = 3.457, P = 0.0364, respectively). Systemic lupus erythematosus patients in the MoCA-L group showed increased characteristic path length ( t = 2.816, P = 0.00651), decreased global ( t = -2.729, P = 0.00826), and local efficiency ( t = -2.623, P = 0.0109) compared with healthy controls. No statistically significant differences in local metrics were found between the MoCA-H group and the healthy control, MoCA-L groups. At the local level, there was statistically significant difference in the node efficiency among the 3 groups ( P < 0.05 after Bonferroni correction). Compared with healthy controls, SLE patients in the MoCA-L group showed decreased node efficiency in left anterior cingulate paracingulate gyrus, bilateral putamen, bilateral pallidum, and left Heschl gyrus. No statistically significant differences in the local metrics were found between the MoCA-H, MoCA-L, and healthy control groups. Correlation analysis in SLE patients in the MoCA-L group showed that the characteristic path length was positively correlated with C4 levels ( r = 0.587, P = 0.007), the global and local efficiencies were negatively correlated with C4 levels ( r = -0.599, P = 0.005; r = -0.599, P = 0.005, respectively), and the node efficiency in the bilateral putamen was negatively correlated with C4 levels ( r = -0.611, P = 0.004; r = -0.570, P = 0.009). The node efficiency in the left pallidum was negatively correlated with disease duration ( r = -0.480, P = 0.032). The node efficiency in the left Heschl gyrus was negatively correlated with IgM levels ( r = -0.478, P = 0.033). No correlation was noted between other network metrics, clinical indicators, and neuropsychological scales. CONCLUSIONS: The topological properties of functional brain networks were disrupted in SLE patients with low MoCA scores, suggesting that altered topological properties of the brain networks were associated with cognitive function in SLE patients. Correlation between altered topological properties of the brain networks and clinical indicators was noted in SLE patients with low MoCA scores, suggesting that altered topological properties of brain networks in SLE patients may have clinical significance as imaging markers for monitoring disease changes in patients with SLE.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».