MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4387167106 · doi:10.4103/hm.hm-d-23-00044

Heart Disease and Stroke

2023· article· en· W4387167106 sur OpenAlexaff
Simon W. Rabkin

Notice bibliographique

RevueHeart and Mind · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésStroke (engine)MedicineCardiorespiratory fitnessDiseasePsychosocialCause of deathCardiomyopathyHeart failureIntensive care medicinePhysical therapyCardiologyInternal medicinePsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dear Readers, I'm pleased to introduce a special issue on “Heart disease and stroke,” from a group of distinguished editors and productive authors from around the globe. It is well known that ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a leading cause of death, claims 8.9 million people worldwide a year. Stroke is also a leading cause of death, claiming at 6.1 million. The two conditions often coexist and are associated with a high mortality. Importantly, cardiac disease can lead to stroke. This special issue includes excellent articles discussing the connection of the heart and brain, in less commonly considered but still critically important areas such as stroke in noncompaction cardiomyopathy and after the cardiac procedure of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Two key issues that impact on the development of the heart–stroke interaction are discussed, specifically the impact of mental stress and disparities in health-related quality of life among adults with IHD, stroke, and both conditions. Physical exercise as a preventive strategy is touched upon, as well in this issue. Heart and Mind is fortunate to have Barry A. Franklin as the spotlight guest. During the interview, Prof. Franklin shared his perspectives on physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and cardiovascular health. He discussed that exercise benefits cardiac patients, yet too much exercise might be risky. He highlights the importance of patients' motivation in cardiac rehabitation programs, provided novel viewpoints on psychosocial stressors, etc. In addition, he revealed the potential power of soft skills for being superachievers. The spotlight article is entitled “Perspectives of Barry A. Franklin, PhD: A World-Renowned Professor, Author, and Speaker.” In the article entitled “Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy and Embolic Events: A Mini-Review,” George Bazoukis et al. discussed that patients with left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC) have an increased risk of embolic events. They conclude that LVNC patients with prior embolic events, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular (LV) thrombus, and LV dysfunction should have anticoagulation. For individuals without a clear indication according to the current guidelines, anticoagulation could be considered when their CHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus and stroke or transient ischemic attack) score is 2 or greater. Amit Hooda et al. provided a “A Narrative Review on Perprocedural Stroke and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Achilles' Heel,” summarizing the currently available strategies for mitigating periprocedural stroke post transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and providing insights into future directions. The authors advocate for large, prospective, randomized controlled trials that are required to predict the patient profile where cerebral embolic protection devices would be useful. Furthermore, additional strategies with newer valve technologies are recommended to improve the neurological safety of TAVR. An article entitled “Mental Stress Contributes to the Pathogenesis of Atherosclerotic Heart and Brain Diseases: A Mini-Review” is contributed by Yongjian Geng. This study highlighted that mental stress serves as an independent risk factor that plays a key role in changing the function and metabolism of cardiovascular tissues during the development of atherosclerotic vascular disease. The author summarized the benefits of increases in positive stress resilience, lower psychological susceptibility while increasing the resilience to cardiovascular insults, and improving dietary supply, lifestyle, and physical fitness. Moreover, preventive and therapeutic approaches are developing in multiple fronts aimed at mitigating the stress-associated vascular responses and development of atherosclerotic vascular disorders. Molly M. Jacobs et al. contributed an article entitled “Disparities in Health-Related Quality of Life among Adults with Ischemic Heart Disease, Stroke, and Both Conditions: A Cross-Sectional Study.” They estimated differences in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) between racial and ethnic groups, as well as racial/ethnic differences in the HRQOL of IHD, stroke, or both conditions. They calculated the Health and Activity Limitation Index – a generic HRQOL measure comprising perceived health and activity limitations – for 29,482 adults, using data from the 2021 US National Health Interview Survey. They found that while IHD and stroke are independently associated with significantly low HRQOL, their co-occurrence has a substantially negative impact on HRQOL, particularly among minority racial groups. In the article “What is Bad for the Heart is Bad for the Brain?,” Eduard Guasch appraised the idea that regular moderate and vigorous exercises positively impinge the cardiovascular–cognition connection. The animal models and human trials suggest that the cognitive benefits promoted by regular exercise may be highly dependent on exercise intensity and duration, yet strenuous and long-term forms of exercise may paradoxically be deleterious. The author claimed that the related data need to be confirmed in large and well-designed studies. With the aim of inspiring physicians and researchers to find better strategies for cardiac patients, this issue explores aspects of prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of heart disease and stroke, especially their connections. The publication of the issue received high-quality contributions from authors from various countries. I remain grateful to them for their incredible support.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,035
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,195

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,292
Écart entre enseignants0,267 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations45
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHeart and MindMême sujetCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesTravaux en français237 207