MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4387191966 · doi:10.4467/24504564pmp.23.005.18234

Conservative Ideas as the Source of Activity of the Polish White Cross in the United States of America

2023· article· en· W4387191966 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elwira Jolanta Kryńska

Notice bibliographique

RevuePolska Myśl Pedagogiczna · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEuropean Politics and Security
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésStatus quoWhite (mutation)Context (archaeology)DemocracyIdeologyPolitical scienceQuarter (Canadian coin)White paperWorld War IILawPolitical economyPoliticsSociologyHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The purpose of this article is to analyze the conservative ideas that are the source of the work of the Polish White Cross in the United States of America. Consideration of this issue is desirable for several reasons. First, today’s resurgent radicalisms are causing the world that we have known for the past quarter of a century to cease to exist right before our eyes. At the same time, the European status quo has been challenged by the war steered by Putin. In this context, a question arises: Does Europe, which is in the process of “change”, still need a conservative voice? To answer this, it is worth recalling not only non-ideological ideas attempting to define the reality of the future, but also practical ones, including those from the early 20th century initiated in the U.S., which played a historical role in the building of Polish statehood, and are now a testimony to joint-Polish-American initiatives that support democratic changes in the world. The reference to these examples is all the more justified because they are based on American conservative thought, which was the source of American human rights policy in the early 20th century. Representatives of the so-called idealist trend (also called Wilsonism), proclaimed that the United States could effectively exercise its function as a world leader if its policies promoted the traditional values of protecting individual rights and freedoms. Of breakthrough importance for the Polish cause was President Thomas Woodrow Wilson’s speech of January 18, 1918, in which, defining America’s war aims, he declared that an independent Polish state must be established as a result of the war. President Wilson also authorized the recruitment of volunteers for the Polish army and their training. Since every national army has its own humanitarian unit called the Red Cross, it was felt that the Polish Army should also have one. Unfortunately, as Poland was non-existent on the map of Europe at the time, it did not participate in the founding deliberations of the international Red Cross association established in 1864 in Switzerland, and therefore did not have the right to establish its own organization under this name. For this reason, Ignacy Jan Paderewski suggested the idea of establishing the Polish White Cross (PBK), which was grounded in conservative ideas. In addition, the tradition of the Polish White Cross is worth discussing because of some opinions that volunteering in Poland was less common than in other Western countries and that Poland has no tradition of it. Meanwhile, the work of White Cross is a spectacular undertaking, unprecedented in the history of Poland, based on the principles of volunteerism, and is comparable to Poland’s current provision of relief action to hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian migrants due to Russia’s ruthless invasion. This, therefore, is another reason to recall the work of the White Cross. Unfortunately, despite the fact that almost every soldier in the Second Republic and in the Polish Armed Forces in the West came into contact with the Polish White Cross, the awareness of its existence and commitment to the cause is still limited. This is probably due to the fact that the so-called People’s Polish Army grew out of other ideological aspirations detached from the traditions of the military formations of the interwar period and organizations cooperating with it. The authorities of People’s Poland supported only socio-political associations associated with “real socialism”.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,016
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,045

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0110,013
Communication savante0,0130,005
Science ouverte0,0010,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,082
Tête enseignante GPT0,392
Écart entre enseignants0,310 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePolska Myśl PedagogicznaMême sujetEuropean Politics and SecurityTravaux en français237 207