Implementing a stability monitoring system at a legacy mine site—case study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Canada has a rich history of mining that has played a significant role in shaping Canada's economy and development. Mining has also left a lasting legacy in the form of closed or abandoned mines. These mine sites often pose safety risks, specifically related to the stability of historical open pit and underground workings— their closure and remediation present significant challenges. This paper discusses a legacy mine site case study focusing on the implementation of a suitable rock mass stability monitoring system. The legacy mine site is located within the town boundaries of a community in northern Canada. The site includes an interconnected open pit and underground workings where some of the mine workings were backfilled. Based on available information, the mine was closed after a failure occurred at depth and some backfill material was lost to a deeper section of the mine. A pond currently exists where the open pit was located. This paper includes a detailed discussion of the existing instrumentation and the implementation of a more comprehensive stability monitoring strategy. The stability in this case is of particular importance, as the site is close to community infrastructure, and consequently, community residents. This paper addresses the benefits of the selected monitoring system and each system component, and includes the challenges resulting from the geographical location, rock mass conditions, and maintenance due to the remoteness of the site. There were no local employees available to address the monitoring system health. The site has not experienced any documented instability since the mine had closed, based on almost three decades of shallow monitoring and site observations. The installation of monitoring systems is usually, targeted at monitoring movement. However, for this site, instability and ground movement were not expected, leading to monitoring focusing on system health and the detection of potential movement. The lack of employees on site also made the health and functionality of the monitoring system critical as there was a desire to prevent frequent system maintenance and troubleshooting.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».