FRI418 A 6-month Lifestyle Intervention Program Improves Quality Of Life And Motivation In Women With Obesity And Infertility
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Disclosure: K. Brûlé: None. A. Thibodeau: None. D. Maillet: None. M. Belan: None. F. Jean-Denis: None. M. Pesant: None. B. Carranza-Mamane: None. J. Baillargeon: Grant Recipient; Self; Ferring Pharmaceuticals. Introduction Infertility is the incapacity to conceive after 12 months of regular and unprotected sexual intercourse, affecting 11 to 16% of couples. Obesity affects fertility, increases fertility treatment costs, diminishes their efficacy, predisposes to many complications during pregnancy and presents risks for the offspring. To prevent those consequences, many organizations recommend that women with obesity be assisted in adopting healthy lifestyle habits before conception and maintain them during pregnancy. Also, women with infertility and those living with obesity score lower on the quality of life (QoL) scales. Therefore, our objective was to assess the impact of a lifestyle intervention on QoL and stages of change (based on the transtheoretical model) in women with obesity and seeking fertility treatments. Methods Women 18-40 years old with infertility and obesity (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 or BMI ≥ 27 kg/m2 for those with polycystic ovary syndrome), consulting at the fertility clinic of an academic center, were enrolled and randomized to usual fertility care (control group, CG) or the intervention program (lifestyle group, LSG) alone for 6 months and then combined to usual care. The lifestyle program focused on improving physical activity and nutrition and was based on motivational communication. It involved individual follow-ups with a nutritionist and a kinesiologist at weeks 0, 3, 6 and then every 6 weeks for 18 months. Also, participants needed to attend 12 group sessions, including workshops and physical activities. QoL scores from the SF-6D and FertiQol, levels of conviction (visual analog scales on 100), and stages of change were collected at baseline and at 6 months. Proportions were compared by Pearson chi-square tests and means by Student’s t tests or ANCOVA (correcting for the baseline value of the result). Results Among 127 women, 85 had available data at 6 months (CG=43, LSG=42). After 6 months, and compared to the CG, women in the LSG improved more their SF-6D (+0.029 ± 0.076 vs -0.017 ± 0.082, p = 0.009, p ANCOVA <0.001) and FertiQoL total score (+0.35 ± 6.85 vs -2.70 ± 11.80, p = 0.18, p ANCOVA = 0.02). A higher proportion of women in LSG improved their stage of change by ≥2 categories compared to CG (40.0% vs 13.2%, p=0.008). They better maintained their level of conviction about the need to improve their food habits (+4.0 ± 13.4 vs -2.7 ± 17.7, p ANCOVA=0.02) or their physical activity (+2.5 ± 10.2 vs -5.1 ± 13.8, p=0.006, p ANCOVA=0.01). Conclusion A lifestyle program targeting women with obesity and infertility significantly helped maintain or increase their QoL, levels of conviction for food habits and physical activity, and stages of change regarding lifestyle habits compared to usual fertility care. These results suggest that such lifestyle intervention can contribute to the well-being and maintenance of lifestyle changes in women with obesity who seek fertility treatments. Presentation: Friday, June 16, 2023
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».