SAT370 Economic Burden of Endometrial Cancer Associated with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Disclosure: L.A. Pace: None. D. Markovic: None. R.P. Buyalos: Employee; Self; Fertility and Surgical Associates of California. F. Bril: None. R. Azziz: Advisory Board Member; Self; Arora Forge. Consulting Fee; Self; Rani Therapeutics, Spruce Biosciences, Fortress Biotech, Core Access Surgical Technologies. Grant Recipient; Self; Foundation for Research and Education Excellence, Ferring Pharmaceuticals. Stock Owner; Self; Martin Imaging. Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorder among reproductive aged females, affecting approximately 6 million U.S. women. Endometrial cancer, in turn, is the most common gynecological malignancy and the fourth most common cancer overall in female patients. Objectives: To assess the excess economic burden associated with endometrial cancer in women with PCOS. Method: Using PRISMA guidelines for systematic review, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopuse, and Embase for all studies on endometrial cancer in patients with known PCOS. Excluded studies were reviews and case reports, those not conducted in human subjects, without controls, without full text available, or reporting solely on diseases other than PCOS. Selected studies were assessed for quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was performed using the DerSimonian-Laird random effects model to assess the pooled risk ratio (RR) for the association between PCOS and endometrial cancer, then calculation of the excess cost was assessed in U.S. dollars (USD), adjusted for inflation using a medical care inflation calculator. Result: We screened 98 studies by title and abstract, 32 titles in full text, and included 11 articles. Pooled RR was 2.90 (95% CI 1.57-5.37), p=0.0196. In the U.S., overall prevalence of endometrial cancer in patients with PCOS is 0.409%, compared with baseline estimated five-year prevalence (2014-2019) of endometrial cancer in all women of 0.141%, or 235,596 cases. The excess prevalence of endometrial cancer in women with PCOS is therefore 0.2679%, or approximately 361 women. Direct healthcare costs associated with endometrial cancer per patient per year were estimated to be $8,597, when adjusted for inflation to 2022 costs. Therefore, the excess cost of endometrial cancer related to PCOS is estimated at 361 x $8,597 = $3.1 million per year in 2022 USD. Conclusion: In 2022 USD, the excess annual healthcare cost for endometrial cancer care in patients with PCOS exceeds $3 million per year. While the overlap between the risk factors and pathophysiologic underpinnings of both conditions is well-known, PCOS is not always directly addressed as a risk factor for endometrial cancer. Given the findings of this meta-analysis, taken in combination with previously collected data estimating the annual healthcare costs associated with PCOS diagnosis and treatment alone, to exceed $2 billion, we advocate for and increased focus in the global health, policy, and scientific communities to better address this condition and its sequelae. Funding: Foundation for Research and Education Excellence Presentation Date: Saturday, June 17, 2023
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,039 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,010 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,010 | 0,011 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».