SAT176 Comparison Of Prevalence For Normocalcemic Primary Hyperparathyroidism (NPHPT) Using Different 25(OH)D Levels: A Systematic Review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Disclosure: I.N. Farooqi: None. X. Wang: None. The familiar topic of vitamin D deficiency remains controversial in the context of bone metabolism and health, with findings supportive of differing thresholds for supplementation. While the Fifth International Workshop has not delineated exact cutoffs for 25(OH)D to rule out the secondary cause of vitamin D deficiency in evaluations of NPHPT, we believe higher thresholds will yield fewer rates of diagnosis. We postulate that a review of existing literature yields significant differences in the reported prevalence of NPHPT when comparing 25(OH)D cutoffs of ≥30ng/mL versus ≥20ng/mL. PubMed searches were conducted using the key words “normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism,” “prevalence,” “trial,” and 7400 studies were initially found. Excluding studies from before 2010, those using population sizes less than 100 subjects, and abstracts, we found a total of 14 articles for which full-text review was performed. We examined 9 studies using the 25(OH)D cutoff ≥20ng/mL and 5 studies using ≥30ng/mL for our analysis. Although research on NPHPT has been done worldwide, including Europe, East Asia, North and South Americas, none were found in Africa, South Asia, and Australia. Our review identified 9/14 studies in Canada, USA, UK, Sweden, Czech Republic, Italy, Belgium, and China which used 25(OH)D ≥20ng/mL to exclude vitamin D deficiency, with a prevalence range of 0.18-21%, averaging 5.81%. Conversely, the remaining 5/14 studies from Brazil, USA, Spain, and Italy using ≥30ng/mL as the lower limit of 25(OH)D for diagnosing NPHPT yielded prevalence rates ranging 0.02-8.9% with an average of 3.17%. The prevalence of NPHPT is 8.9% in the Brazilian study by Marques et al. in 2011 and 6% in the Spanish study by Garcia-Martin in 2012, while the remainder of North American and European studies using the ≥30ng/mL cutoff from 2015 onward reported prevalence rates of only 0.02-0.6%. Of the total number of publications reviewed since 2015, 30% of the studies implemented the higher threshold of ≥30ng/mL. Previously documented prevalence rates of NPHPT among healthy adults have used 25(OH)D ≥20ng/mL to define the exclusion of vitamin D deficiency; however, our current review of several studies since 2010 demonstrates a significantly lower prevalence of the disease when the cutoff is raised to ≥30ng/mL. Our findings suggest greater specificity in the exclusion of vitamin D deficiency in more recent publications. Recent research examining free 25(OH)D as a more effective marker for vitamin D status suggests total 25(OH)D ≥30ng/mL may still be insufficient to completely exclude vitamin D deficiency in NPHPT. Thus, the role of varying 25(OH)D cutoffs is interesting and requires further investigation on a geographic level, as it may provide more insight into interethnic variations, correlation with seasonality and sunlight exposure, and healthcare access in regions where such studies have yet to be conducted. Presentation: Saturday, June 17, 2023
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,033 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,010 | 0,011 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,010 | 0,011 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».