MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4387397861 · doi:10.1353/nin.2023.a903316

The 1880 Natick Boarding House Nine

2023· article· en· W4387397861 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Woody Eckard

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLeagueCensusBasketballClubMinor (academic)Quarter (Canadian coin)DemographyGeographyMedicineSociologyPolitical sciencePopulationArchaeologyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The 1880 Natick Boarding House Nine Woody Eckard (bio) In mid-June 1880, a small hotel in the town of Natick, Massachusetts had nine "base ballists" living there as boarders. They were all members of the Natick Base Ball Club, a minor professional team active May through July. No fewer than seven of these men also played Major League Baseball, as did two others on the team earlier and later that year. One member has been honored by the Baseball Hall of Fame, though not for his Natick exploits. This article introduces the players, then explains the unusual circumstance of an entire team staying at the same boarding house. Next, the article describes the Natick's 1880 season and the careers of the major leaguers, providing a window to the operation of "minor league" teams and player career paths. The individual details in an 1880 US Census document, including full name, age, and state or country of birth, allow accurate player identification and linkage to major league profiles on baseball-reference.com. Last, we present evidence of an apparent unfortunate outcome of the close quarters living that resonates in our current pandemic age. the natick nine While conducting unrelated research on Ancestry.com, the author happened upon a Natick US Census document from June 18, 1880 describing the persons staying at a small boarding hotel.1 The document lists the proprietor Daniel Sheehan and his family. Next are nine "boarders" who all identify their occupation as "base ballist." Table 1 lists the ball players in alphabetical order with related information from the Census document. The document also indicates that a few other persons lived at the hotel. Of course, nine baseball players listed together suggests the possibility that this is an entire team. Figure 1 shows a brief summary of the Natick Club's 1880 season, published in the August 28 New York Clipper, that lists the primary nine players and their stats.2 Eight of the boarding hotel ball players match the Natick players listed in the summary. The missing player, Stephen Dignan, shows up in a June 4 Natick box score from The Boston Globe of June 5. Thus, all nine of [End Page 100] the boarding house "base ballists" were members of the Natick Base Ball Club. Click for larger view View full resolution Table 1. The Sheehan boarding hotel "base ballists" The Census document indicates that all the players were single, and all but one aged twenty-four years or younger. Seven of the nine Naticks were Irish: one was born in Ireland and six with one or both parents born in Ireland. Of the seven US natives, six were born in Massachusetts and the seventh (Robinson) in Pennsylvania. The Natick Bulletin of May 21 described player origins.3 Cronin, Donovan, McLaughlin, and Shaunessy were from small towns in eastern Massachusetts, and the remainder were mostly "Boston boys." Click for larger view View full resolution Fig. 1. Summary of the Natick Club's 1880 season, with player stats, from the New York Clipper, August 28, 1880. The financial structure of the Natick Club could not be gleaned from newspaper searches. The players were no doubt compensated, but on a small-town club, fixed salaries were unlikely given attendance uncertainties. Natick's 1880 population was 8,112 persons. A gate-sharing "cooperative" arrangement was more likely, or perhaps salaries on a week-to-week basis. A Natick newspaper article advertising the May 29 game with Hudson mentions an admission fee of twenty-five cents.4 [End Page 101] Natick also had a baseball club in 1879. However, only one player carried over to 1880 (Pettee) based on 1879 box scores. There was no baseball club in Natick in 1881, perhaps because the 1880 club disbanded early for lack of fan support (see below). why all nine at one hotel? And now to the key question of how an entire team came to be billeted at a single small hotel. As it happens, the answer is linked to the question of who managed the Naticks. The May 28 Natick Bulletin stated, without elaboration: "Mr. Sheehan is the manager." Is this the Daniel Sheehan who ran the hotel? Confirmation...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,171
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,990

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,204 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207