Last Time Out; Big League Farewells of Baseball's Greats by John Nogoski (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Last Time Out; Big League Farewells of Baseball's Greats by John Nogoski Chad S. Wise John Nogoski. Last Time Out; Big League Farewells of Baseball's Greats. Essex, CT: Lyons Press, 2022, 310 pp. Paperback, $22.95. Attend any Major League Baseball game in any city, and you'll find fans wearing jerseys of not only current stars, but legends as well. Having grown up near Cincinnati, Ohio, I can remember seeing jerseys of the Big Red Machine: Johnny Bench, Pete Rose, Dave Concepcion, and Tony Perez. We put our stars on pedestals, not for their off-field lives, but for the way they played the game. They were as close to being gods as any human could imagine. However, as I look back at some of my Reds heroes, I can recall how their names and fanfare started fading away year after year. They were replaced by younger, faster, and stronger players. In John Nogoski's book, Last Time Out; Big League Farewells of Baseball's Greats, he shares with baseball fans of all ages how the careers of so many great players came to conclusions, some bowing out gracefully, while others were sent packing by an unforgiving media and fanbase. Nogoski's book covers forty-five baseball players from the last century, describing the stories behind each of their final farewells. Some, like Ted Williams retired at the top of their game. In a career that spanned twenty-one years, Williams wasn't without controversy. His relationship with the media was certainly strained. However, his talking was done on the field. He hit 521 total home runs (putting him in third place at the time, behind Babe Ruth and Jimmie Foxx, and good for twentieth place on the home run list as of today), hit nearly 2,000 runs batted in, and had nearly 2,700 hits. He also lost some of his prime playing years while serving as fighter pilot in World War II and Korea. The most amazing statistic for Williams involves his home runs. In his final year of 1960, he started the season with a home run. By the last game of the year, to a small crowd of just about 10,000 people at Fenway Park that held three times as many fans, he did the unthinkable. At the age of forty-two, he hit a home run in his last at bat as a player. As he entered the dugout after his final home run, the fans and players cheered him out of the dugout for a "curtain call." That was not, however, how Williams played the game. He simply looked at Jack Fisher, pitcher for the Baltimore Orioles, and motioned for him to pitch to the next batter. To even casual fans of baseball, Game Six of the 1975 World Series between Boston and Cincinnati seemed like it happened yesterday. Who hasn't seen the video of Boston's catcher, Carlton Fisk, motioning his arms at the ball he hit to stay fair? The ball did stay fair, and the Red Sox went on to win the [End Page 140] game and force a seventh game. The home run Fisk hit was probably his single most memorable event in a career that lasted twenty-four years, catching 2,226 games and hitting 351 home runs (79). As the years piled up, things started to change for Fisk. The new ballplayers began, in his words, "cheating the game," not running out singles and not playing at full speed. Nogoski describes an incident between Fisk and New York Yankees outfielder Deion Sanders in 1990: Sanders hit a short ball that would be an easy play at first. But instead of running it out, Sanders jogged to first. This infuriated Fisk, who yelled, "Run it out, you piece of s***!" and caused the umpire to step in and diffuse the situation (76). This was a sign that Fisk's "moral crisis" with younger players was becoming a real issue. As Nogoski writes, "At 45, his (Fisk) sermons were mostly falling on deaf ears already plugged with headphones and diamond earrings. Fisk felt as much of an outsider as a rookie" (78...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,105 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».