THU041 Clinical Improvements In Patients With Cushing’s Disease Treated With Osilodrostat According To Urinary And Late-night Salivary Cortisol Levels: Pooled Analysis From LINC 3 And LINC 4
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Disclosure: B.M. Biller: Consulting Fee; Self; HRA Pharmaceuticals, Recordati Rare Diseases, Sparrow, Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge). Research Investigator; Self; served on the LINC 3 steering committee. M. Fleseriu: Consulting Fee; Self; HRA Pharmaceuticals, Recordati Rare Diseases, Sparrow, Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge). Grant Recipient; Self; Recordati Rare Diseases, Sparrow, Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge). Research Investigator; Self; served on the LINC 3 steering committee. R. Pivonello: Consulting Fee; Self; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Recordati, Corcept Therapeutics, Pfizer, Inc., Bresmed Health Solutions, Damor farmaceutici, S&R Farmaceutici SpA, Organon Italia Srl, Siunergos Pharma, Biohealth Italia Srl. Research Investigator; Self; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Recordati, Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge), Corcept Therapeutics, Takeda, Neurocrine Biosciences, Camurus AB, Pfizer, Inc., Merk Serono, Ibsa. R. Feelders: Consulting Fee; Self; HRA Pharmaceuticals, Recordati. Grant Recipient; Self; Corcept Therapeutics. M. Gadelha: Advisory Board Member; Self; Novo Nordisk, Recordati, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals. Speaker; Self; Recordati, Ipsen, Pfizer, Inc., Crinetics, Novo Nordisk. A. Lacroix: Consulting Fee; Self; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Recordati, Corcept Therapeutics, Ipsen, Novo Nordisk. Grant Recipient; Self; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Recordati, Corcept Therapeutics, Ipsen, Novo Nordisk. P. Witek: Grant Recipient; Self; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Ipsen, Recordati, Novo Nordisk, Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge), Lilly. Speaker; Self; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Ipsen, Recordati, Novo Nordisk, Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge), Lilly. A.P. Heaney: Advisory Board Member; Self; Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge), Novo Nordisk, Lundbeck Pharma. Speaker; Self; Chiasma, Ipsen. A. Piacentini: Employee; Self; Recordati. A.M. Pedroncelli: Employee; Self; Recordati. J. Newell-Price: Consulting Fee; Self; Crinetics, Diurnal, HRA Pharmaceuticals, Recordati Rare Diseases. Grant Recipient; Self; Crinetics, Diurnal, HRA Pharmaceuticals, Recordati Rare Diseases. Introduction: In two Phase III studies (LINC 3, NCT02180217; LINC 4, NCT02697734), osilodrostat, a potent oral 11β-hydroxylase inhibitor, led to rapid, sustained reductions in mean urinary free cortisol (mUFC) and late-night salivary cortisol (LNSC), as well as improvements in clinical signs of hypercortisolism and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), in patients (pts) with Cushing’s disease (CD). mUFC and LNSC are recommended for monitoring treatment response. Objective: We assessed if pts with control of both mUFC and LNSC experienced greater improvements in clinical signs of hypercortisolism and HRQoL, compared to control of mUFC alone. Methods: LINC 3 comprised a 48-week (W) core phase, including an 8W randomized-withdrawal period. LINC 4 included a 12W, double-blind, placebo-controlled period followed by 36W of open-label osilodrostat. Both studies had an optional extension. mUFC (mean of 2–3 samples; normal range [NR] 11–138 nmol/24h [4–50 µg/24h]) and LNSC (one sample; NR ≤2.5 nmol/L [≤0.9 µg/L]) were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Changes in cardiovascular/metabolic-related parameters, physical manifestations of hypercortisolism and HRQoL were assessed in the pooled population according to mUFC and LNSC control status: both controlled (C) mUFC + LNSC (mUFC ≤ULN + LNSC ≤ULN), C-mUFC (mUFC ≤ULN + LNSC >ULN) and uncontrolled (UC) mUFC + LNSC (mUFC >ULN + LNSC >ULN). Pts with C-LNSC (mUFC >ULN + LNSC ≤ULN) were not analyzed as very few pts had control of LNSC without UFC control. This analysis includes pts in core and extension phases with both mUFC and LNSC assessments available. Periods where pts received placebo were excluded. Results: 136 (85.0%) of 160 pts with available assessments had UC mUFC + LNSC at baseline (BL). At W48 (n=133) and W72 (n=111), respectively, 59 (44.4%) and 54 (48.6%) pts had C mUFC + LNSC, 49 (36.8%) and 44 (39.6%) had C-mUFC, and 19 (14.3%) and 11 (9.9%) had UC mUFC + LNSC. Pts with C mUFC + LNSC had greater percentage improvements from BL to W72 in cardiovascular/metabolic-related parameters than pts with C-mUFC or UC mUFC + LNSC, respectively: fasting plasma glucose, –5.0%, –4.8%, 1.9%; glycated hemoglobin, –5.1%, –4.8%, –1.3%; weight, –6.5%, –6.5%, –4.5%; waist circumference, –7.2%, –6.3%, –4.9%. Physical manifestations of hypercortisolism generally improved from BL to W72 regardless of mUFC/LNSC control. Pts with C mUFC + LNSC or C-mUFC had the greatest improvement from BL to W72 in HRQoL. Conclusions: The greatest improvements in cardiovascular/metabolic-related parameters and HRQoL were observed in pts with C mUFC + LNSC or C-mUFC, compared to pts with UC mUFC + LNSC. Improvements in most physical manifestations of hypercortisolism were observed regardless of mUFC/LNSC control. Data are limited by small patient numbers in some groups. Normalization of both mUFC and LNSC can improve long-term treatment outcomes in pts with CD. Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».