Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I am delighted to present the inaugural "Horizons in Synaptic Neuroscience" article collection. This collection showcases high-impact, authoritative, and reader-friendly review articles covering the most topical research at the frontiers of synaptic neuroscience. As Chief Editor, I was asked to identify and nominate the contributing authors in recognition of their prominence and influence in their respective fields. The cutting-edge work presented in this article collection thus highlights the diversity of research performed across the entire breadth of the synaptic neuroscience field and reflects on the latest advances in primary as well as translational research.In the class view, synapses are communication devices between neurons. However, together with pre-and postsynaptic neurons, astrocytes form structures called tripartite synapses, by which they participate in bidirectional synaptic communication (Perea et al., 2009). Whereas the impact of the transcription factor cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) response element (CRE)-binding protein (CREB) has been relatively well investigated in neurons, less is known about its role in astrocytes. In their mini review, Kim and Kaang (2023) therefore explore how CREB mediates responses in astrocytes. They first discuss the classic G protein-coupled receptor activated cAMP/protein kinase A (PKA) pathway for activating CREB, but they also examine noncanonical pathways, such as receptor tyrosine kinases, Notch, and Phosphatidylinositol 3kinase/Akt. They end with a brief note on CREB in reactive astrocytes and pathology. In sum, this mini review highlights the significance of CREB in gliotransmission from astrocytes to neurons and their synapses, an important but relatively less well studied topic that deserves considerable further research.Another classic view is Dale's law, i.e., the notion that a neuron releases the same chemical transmitter from all its synaptic outputs regardless of target cell identity, a postulate that Sir John Eccles was first to attribute to Henry Dale (Eccles et al., 1954). It has, however, long been argued that Dale's principle does not always hold (Sossin et al., 1990;Jonas et al., 1998;Nicoll and Malenka, 1998). The mini review of Kim and Sabatini (2023) highlights how neurons that release more than one type of neurotransmitter have been found in many organisms and brain areas. They focus more specifically on how a key challenge with exploring synaptic co-transmission lies in the tools and approaches necessary to understand multi-transmitter release. For instance, it can be difficult to determine whether two transmitters are co-packaged in the same vesicles, or alternatively independently released via distinct vesicles of the same presynaptic terminal. Kim and Sabatini (2023) discuss the merits of different methods for addressing such queries, such as proteomics, electrophysiology, optical approaches, and statistics.Since neurons critically rely on chemical neurotransmission for information transfer, it is not surprising that malfunction of transmitter release is linked to neuropathology. In their review, Uzay and Kavalali (2023) discuss how different mutations in various components of the release machinery lead to neurological and psychiatric symptoms, by affecting cross-neuron information transfer and nervous system function. They first explore soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein (SNAP) receptor (SNARE) proteins such as Synaptobrevin-2, SNAP25, and Syntaxin-1, and then move on to investigating the calcium sensor Synaptotagmin-1, the SNAREstabilizing complexins, the synaptic vesicle fusion protein Munc18-1, and the vesicle priming machinery protein Munc13. The authors conclude that, despite the wealth of knowledge on the synaptic release machinery, there is much to clarify regarding how pathogenic mutations affect release so that we can develop new therapies that are adapted to the distinct dysfunction associated with specific genetic variants.Astrocytes have also been associated with neuropathology, which is perhaps also expected since they vastly outnumber neurons in the brain (Sofroniew and Vinters, 2010). In their mini review, Wang et al. ( 2022) discuss how astrocytes by way of their key role in neurodevelopment have a major impact on diseases related to intellectual disability. They explore reactive astrocytes, ion channel as well as molecular dysfunction, and the role of astrocytes in environmental factors such as excessive alcohol intake during pregnancy. They end by discussing the effects of intellectual disability drugs on astrocytes, to highlight the potential for therapy. One could thus consider the astrocyte both friend and foe in intellectual disability.Globally, more than 1.5 billion people suffer from hearing loss (Chadha et al., 2021). In children, sensorineural hearing loss is the most frequent congenital sensory disorder. Of these cases, 70% have been ascribed to non-syndromic hearing loss (Sindura and Banerjee, 2019). In their review, Li et al. ( 2023) discuss how the GAIP interacting protein c terminus 3 gene GIPC3 is strongly associated with non-syndromic hearing loss, and how screening for GIPC3 variants is key to early detection of hearing loss in children. They overview the GIPC3 gene, explore effects of GIPC3 mutation on the auditory system, and conclude that focussing on GIPC3 is useful for understanding hereditary deafness and its developmental mechanisms.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,063 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,013 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,009 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle