MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4387532274 · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1304773

Editorial: Mesenchymal and immune cell crosstalk in fibrotic diseases

2023· editorial· en· W4387532274 sur OpenAlexafffund
Kinji Asahina, Subburaj Ilangumaran

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers in Immunology · 2023
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Établissements canadiensUniversité de Sherbrooke
Organismes subventionnairesJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development
Mots-clésMesenchymal stem cellCrosstalkImmune systemMedicineImmunologyBiologyCell biologyEngineeringElectronic engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Fibroblasts, a type of mesenchymal cells, are a source of myofibroblasts and are key players in organ fibrosis. Upon organ injury, tissue-resident fibroblasts are activated to differentiate into myofibroblasts (1). Myofibroblasts express extracellular matrix proteins and participate in progression of fibrosis in the liver, lungs, skin, and other organs. Myofibroblasts produce pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, and induce recruitment of inflammatory immune cells to the fibrotic area. Although fibrosis is recognized as a wound healing process, excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix proteins and myofibroblasts in tissues results in severe fibrosis, which is considered irreversible. Currently, there are no approved drugs for reversal of severe organ fibrosis.In liver fibrosis, hepatic stellate cells are the major source of myofibroblasts (2). Hepatic stellate cells store vitamin A lipids and reside in the space of Disse between hepatocytes and sinusoidal endothelial cells. Following liver injury, damaged hepatocytes release damage-associated molecular patterns and induce activation of hepatic stellate cells. The activated hepatic stellate cells synthesize extracellular matrix proteins, proinflammatory cytokines, and chemokines to induce inflammation. In this special issue,Exosomes derived from hepatocytes or macrophages induce activation of hepatic stellate cells in liver fibrosis. In contrast, exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells exert antifibrotic effects on the activated hepatic stellate cells. Exosomes may serve as biomarkers for diagnosis of liver diseases, including fibrosis. Tissue-resident macrophages are derived from myeloid progenitor cells present in the embryonic yolk sac (4). In the liver, resident macrophages, called Kupffer cells, play an important role in protecting the liver from microorganisms that are transported from the intestine through the portal vein. Kupffer cells are immotile cells that communicate with hepatic stellate cells and hepatocytes via soluble factors to control liver homeostasis, response to injury, and regeneration. In addition to Kupffer cells, monocytederived macrophages are recruited to the injured liver tissue to elicit inflammatory responses (5). Hassan et al. have reviewed the roles of resident Kupffer cells and monocyte-derived macrophages in liver injury (6). Both the cell types exhibit distinct phenotypes and contribute toward inflammation, fibrogenesis, and repair during different phases. Activation of tissue repair macrophages or suppression of inflammatory macrophages is an attractive therapeutic strategy for treatment of liver fibrosis. By modulating these cells, resolution of fibrosis and regeneration of the liver can be controlled. SOCS1 is a negative regulator of many signaling pathways activated by cytokines and growth factors. Kandhi et al. experimentally deleted SOCS1 in hepatic stellate cells and observed overactivation of these cells and induction of severe liver fibrosis (7). Deletion of SOCS1 in hepatic stellate cells resulted in recruitment of inflammatory macrophages to the fibrotic liver, indicating the crucial role of hepatic stellate cells in the recruitment of inflammatory macrophages in liver fibrosis.Similar to hepatic stellate cells in the liver, fibroblasts in other organs play an important role in fibrotic reactions. Asthma is a chronic inflammatory lung disease in which lung fibroblasts secrete inflammatory cytokines to induce inflammation. Neutrophils, eosinophils, mast cells, and T cells are major immune cells involved in asthmatic inflammation. Thiam et al. reviewed co-culture systems of lung fibroblasts and immune cells in 2D and 3D (8). These new culture systems may help clarify crosstalk between fibroblasts and immune cells and identify new therapeutics for the treatment of asthma and fibrosis in other organs.In internal organs, tissue fibroblasts originate from mesodermal cells. In the liver, hepatic stellate cells express both mesenchymal and neural cell markers; however, they are derived from the mesoderm during embryonic development (9). In contrast, the origins of dermal fibroblasts in the skin are heterogeneous; they are derived from the mesoderm and neural crest. Knoedler et al. have reviewed the heterogeneous embryonic origins of dermal fibroblasts and their distinct roles in wound healing process in the skin (10).Similar to dermal fibroblasts, mesenchymal populations in other organs, such as the liver, are heterogeneous (11). Further studies are required to understand whether heterogeneous mesenchymal populations play distinct roles in organ fibrosis and inflammation. As evidenced in this special issue, crosstalk between fibroblasts and immune cells, such as macrophages, is an attractive target for suppression of fibrosis. However, macrophages are heterogeneous populations that rapidly change their phenotype depending on their environment and stimuli received from other cells. Further comprehensive studies on the crosstalk between mesenchymal cells and macrophages is necessary to develop therapeutics against organ fibrosis.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,024
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,082

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,009
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0050,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,003
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0050,005
Science ouverte0,0040,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0120,012
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0240,014

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,235
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrontiers in Immunology→Même sujetInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis→Travaux en français237 207→