Treatment of Bouveret syndrome with stone fragmentation using an endoscopic submucosal dissection knife
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Video 1Treatment of Bouveret syndrome with stone fragmentation using an endoscopic submucosal dissection knife. A 61-year-old man with a 3-decade history of recurrent cholecystitis presented to the community emergency department with severe right upper quadrant pain. A CT scan was performed and revealed gangrenous cholecystitis with likely cholecystoduodenal fistulous communication.After discussion with the patient and the HPB team, the plan was made to attempt endoscopic extraction of the obstructing stone. This would be performed in the operating room, such that if endoscopic extraction was not possible, surgical management would proceed.During the endoscopy, 1 L of liquid material was suctioned and the retained solids were cleared as best as possible. The large obstructing stone was then seen in the duodenal cap. In the cap, we could appreciate the obstructing stone and the fistulous tract.We then passed a guidewire distal to the stone and advanced a 15- to 20-mm extraction balloon over the guidewire. The balloon was passed distal to the stone and inflated to 20 mm. We then applied firm, steady traction in an attempt to extract the stone.With the double-channel gastroscope, we passed a second wire and extraction balloon distal to the stone to increase the amount of traction that could be applied. Both balloons were inflated distal to the stone, and steady, firm traction was again applied. Unfortunately, this was not successful either.We then decided to use a regular ERCP needle knife to incise the stone. Because the knife was delicate, it was easily deformable, so we decided to switch to a triangle-tip knife.Using the "PreciseSECT" mode on the electrosurgical unit, the stone was repeatedly incised. Particular care was taken to avoid flinging the knife and damaging the duodenal wall.Saline was used as the irrigation solution to ensure electrosurgical conductivity when the current was applied.At this point, we could appreciate fragmentation of the stones after repeated incision.After about 3 hours of stone incision and fragmentation, the guidewire was passed beyond the stone; the extraction balloon was advanced over the wire; and the balloon was again inflated with steady traction applied. This time, the stone was successfully extracted from the stomach.The duodenum was then examined. There were no remaining large pieces of stone or any significant mucosal damage or perforation.Using a mechanical lithotripter, the remaining larger fragments of stone were fragmented and extracted. However, because the stone had a large diameter, lithotripsy at the center was not initially possible, and the smaller lateral aspects had to be performed until the stone was completely fragmented.This case demonstrates the incision and fragmentation of a massive gallstone with the use of an endoscopic submucosal dissection knife and electrosurgical unit.With cautious application of this technique, successful endoscopic management of a large gallstone causing Bouveret syndrome was achieved. This technique avoided open surgical management and allowed for elective cholecystectomy at a later date with less morbidity.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle