Clinical Effects of Pulsed Dye Laser Dynamically Combined with Triamcinolone Acetonide in the Treatment of Postoperative Recurrence Keloids
Dossier post-publication
OpenAlex signale ce travail comme rétracté, mais aucune notice correspondante de Retraction Watch ne figure dans cette base.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Purpose: This study aimed to explore the clinical effects of pulsed dye laser (PDL) dynamically combined with triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) in the treatment of post-operative keloids recurrence. Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively analysed the clinical data of 29 keloid patients (with 39 keloids) from April 2014 to February 2020. The patients were divided into TAC group (14 patients with 19 keloids) and dynamic treatment group (15 patients with 20 keloids) according to the post-operative treatment that they received. The keloids were assessed by Vancouver scar scale (VSS), patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) and the effect of keloids on the quality of life of patients was evaluated with dermatology life quality index (DLQI) scale before the surgical treatment, at any time of relapse, and 24 months after the surgical treatment. The recurrence-free interval, relative cure time, and the cumulative times of TAC injection when the relative cure could be assessed as achieved, and the incidence of adverse reactions were calculated. Results: Patients experiencing a recurrence within 2 years after surgery included 19 keloids (25.33%) that developed a recurrent event within 6 months, 34 keloids (45.33%) that within 12 months, and 39 keloids (52.00%) that within 24 months after surgery. Anterior chest keloid had the highest recurrence rate and ear keloid had the lowest recurrence rate. The total pigmentation and vascularity (VSS and POSAS) scores of patients' keloids in TAC group and dynamic treatment group 24 months after treatment were significantly lower than those before treatment and at relapse ( P < 0.05), the total VSS and POSAS scores were significantly lower at 24 months than before treatment and at relapse ( P < 0.05), and the DLQI scale score was significantly lower at 24 months than before treatment ( P < 0.05). The VSS and POSAS scores of patients' keloids at 24 months after treatment were significantly lower in the dynamic treatment group than in the TAC group. The relative cure time of patients' keloids in the dynamic treatment group was 6.47 ± 2.72 months, which was significantly shorter than 8.65 ± 3.67 months in the TAC group ( P < 0.05). The cumulative number of TAC injections that were given to achieve a relative cure of patients' keloids in dynamic treatment group was 3.60 ± 1.76, which was significantly less than 5.24 ± 2.25 in TAC group. The total incidence of adverse reactions was lower in the dynamic group than in TAC group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance ( P > 0.05). Conclusions: Compared with TAC injection alone, PDL dynamically combined with TAC in the treatment of keloid with post-operative recurrence can shorten the relative cure time, reduce the number of TAC injections and improve the clinical efficacy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».