40 years’ experience of using isotretinoin in treatment of acne: efficacy, optimal dosage, relapses
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objective — to analyze domestic and foreign literature sources on the use of systemic isotretinoin (SI) in the treatment of acne, focus on aspects of the evolution of the isotretinoin molecule, new routes of action and dosing regimens of the drug, the effectiveness of therapy, relapses and prognostic factors of their development. Materials and methods. We conducted the analysis of publications (systematic reviews, clinical trials and observational studies) from the databases of the Vernadskyi National Library of Ukraine, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science and Scopus by June 2023. The search criteria were the words «acne», «systemic therapy», «isotretinoin», «isotretinoin-LIDOSE», «mechanism of action», «efficacy», «daily dose», «cumulative dose», «relapses» and their analogues in the English language. The final choice of 60 sources was based on the author’s judgments about their completeness and significance for solving the goals. Results and discussion. The clinical efficacy of SI is due to its powerful effect on the leading links of the pathogenesis: hyperproliferation of follicular keratinocytes, hyperactivity of sebocytes, excessive colonization of Cutibacterium acnes and immune-mediated inflammation. A comparative analysis of two forms of SI existing in Ukraine was carried out, the advantages of isotretinoin-LIDOSE over standard isotretinoin in clinical practice were determined. It is not possible to draw a clear conclusion about the indications for SI use in acne because there are conflicting recommendations in national guidelines (USA, UK, Canada) and the international consensus of the Global Alliance. At present, in addition to the standard daily doses of SI, a number of regimens have been proposed in the treatment of moderate and mild acne, suggesting a certain reduction in the corresponding doses that decreases the risk of side effects and has sufficient therapeutic efficacy. The advantages and disadvantages of standard, high-dose and low-dose isotretin regimens are described in terms of effectiveness, duration of remission, and relapse rate. Conclusions. Isotretinoin has a high profile of clinical efficacy. It is a treatment for severe and moderate forms of acne that provides a stable therapeutic effect at standard (0.5—1 mg/kg/day) or high doses (more than 1 mg/kg/day). The treatment of acne of moderate and mild severity with low daily doses of SI (less than 0.5 mg/kg) leads to the preservation of the effectiveness of therapy while improving tolerability and reducing the possible risk of side effects. It was determined that the rate of regression of clinical manifestations of acne does not depend on the daily dose (low, standard, high), but the frequency of relapses increases in patients who received low doses. The effectiveness of treatment is higher with the use of fixed (daily) standard, low or high doses of SI compared with intermittent use (every other day, 1 week or 10 days per month). Achieving a cumulative dose (120 to 150 mg/kg) is supported by clinical studies, consensus and dermatological practice. The duration of therapy with standard doses is 16—24 weeks, in the low-dose regimen — for a long time (more than 8 months). It is determined individually until a clinical effect is achieved. In cases of earlier regression of acne manifestations, when patients have not reached the cumulative dose, treatment with SI should be continued until complete regression of the rash and for the following 4—8 weeks. The use of isotretinoin-LIDOSE due to extrabioavailability, high solubility, independence from food intake allows obtaining better clinical results and improving compliance in the treatment of acne patients.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,015 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».