MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4387733398 · doi:10.14309/01.ajg.0000953072.18583.27

S858 Corticosteroid-Sparing Effect in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis Treated With Mirikizumab Maintenance Therapy

2023· article· en· W4387733398 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMicroscopic Colitis
Établissements canadiensWestern University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineUlcerative colitisGastroenterologyInternal medicinePrednisoneMaintenance therapyCorticosteroidRandomized controlled trialPlaceboProctitisSurgeryChemotherapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Corticosteroid (CS)-free remission is a treatment goal for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Mirikizumab’s (miri) CS-sparing effect was assessed in the LUCENT-2 maintenance trial among patients receiving CS at baseline (BL). Methods: In LUCENT-1, patients on miri or placebo (PBO) who entered the study on CS remained on their stable BL dose (≤20mg/day prednisone equivalent) during induction (Week [W] 0 to W12). Patients randomized to miri induction and achieving clinical response (N=365) at W12 were re-randomized 2:1 in LUCENT-2 to miri (200mg/4 weeks) or PBO for maintenance (W12-52). LUCENT-1 responders began a CS taper upon entering LUCENT-2 by tapering the >10mg daily dose by 5mg/week until receiving 10mg/day, and then 2.5mg/week until 0mg/day. For those receiving ≤10mg/day, the daily dose was tapered by 2.5 mg/week until 0mg/day. Clinical remission was defined as a Mayo stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 with ≥1-point decrease from W0 BL, a rectal bleeding subscore of 0, and an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 (excluding friability). Descriptive statistics were calculated with non-responder imputation used for missing data. The common risk difference between miri and PBO was calculated and adjusted for the following stratification factors: prior biologic/tofacitinib failure, region, and W12 clinical remission status. Results: Of the miri induction responders who were re-randomized in LUCENT-2, 33% (59/179) of PBO patients were BL CS users compared with 34% (125/365) of miri patients. The median BL CS dose was 20 mg/day. At W52, a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with maintenance miri vs PBO, achieved clinical remission while off CS, clinical remission + off CS for ≥12 weeks, and clinical remission + symptomatic remission at W40 +off CS for ≥12 weeks (Table 1; all p≤0.01). A significantly greater proportion of patients treated with miri permanently discontinued CS by W24, W40, and W52 vs PBO (Table 1; all P< 0.001) and among patients who completed W52 of miri treatment, 95.2% permanently discontinued CS by W52. Conclusion: Among patients on CS at BL, miri induction responders who were re-randomized to miri maintenance achieved CS-free clinical remission at W52 at higher rates than miri induction responders who were re-randomized to PBO maintenance. Mirikizumab’s CS-sparing effect in patients with moderately to severely active UC is clinically meaningful and aligned with long-term treatment goals of CS discontinuation. Table 1. - Corticosteroid-Sparing Effects in Patients on Baseline Systemic Corticosteroids Treated with Mirikizumab vs Placebo MirikizumabN=125 PlaceboN=59 Common risk difference (95% CI) P-value Patients achieving clinical remission Clinical remission and off CS at Week 52 52 (41.6%) 9 (15.3%) 22.3 (9.9–34.6) P=0.002 Clinical remission at Week 52 and off CS for ≥12 weeks 51 (40.8%) 9 (15.3%) 21.2 (8.9–33.4) P=0.003 Clinical remission at Week 52 with symptomatic remission at Week 40 and off CS for ≥12 weeks 48 (38.4%) 7 (11.9%) 21.9 (10.7–33.2) P=0.002 Patients permanently off CS by week* Off CS at Week 52 among treatment completers 99/104 (95.2%) 26/30 (86.7%) NA** NA** Off CS at Week 52 99 (79.2%) 26 (44.1%) 34.2 (19.2–49.2) P< 0.001 Off CS at Week 40 96 (76.8%) 25 (42.4%) 33.1 (18.0–48.3) P< 0.001 Off CS at Week 24 88 (70.4%) 23 (39.0%) 30.5 (15.2–45.8) P< 0.001 Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; CS = corticosteroid; N = number of patients in group.Risk difference CI were calculated with the Mantel-Haenszel-Sato method. P-values were calculated with the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted by prior biologic/tofacitinib failure and Week 0 CS use. Non-responder imputation was used for missing data. Patients who discontinued study treatment or received rescue treatment were defined as treatment failures (i.e., remaining on CS).*Patients were off CS and did not discontinue study treatment or re-initiate CS use for the remainder of the study period.**NA = not available. Formal treatment comparison for this endpoint not performed because this is an observed analysis.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,520
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,540

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,251
Écart entre enseignants0,243 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle