S843 Symptomatic Improvement Observed Within 2 Days of Etrasimod Induction Therapy: Results From ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 Studies in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: The time from treatment initiation to symptom relief, including rectal bleeding (RB) and stool frequency (SF), is key for patients (pts) with ulcerative colitis (UC) and can help guide therapy decisions. Etrasimod is an investigational, oral, once-daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator in development for the treatment of moderately to severely active UC. Data from pt e-diaries can help inform on symptoms in pts with UC. Methods: We present a post hoc analysis of daily e-diary data collected on RB and SF from pts enrolled in the ELEVATE UC 52 (NCT03945188) and ELEVATE UC 12 (NCT03996369) phase 3 clinical trials.1 Data were pooled from the ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 studies, which randomized pts with moderately to severely active UC and an inadequate response or loss of response or intolerance to ≥ 1 approved UC therapy 2:1 to receive etrasimod 2 mg once daily or placebo (PBO). Daily Mayo RB and SF subscores (RBS and SFS) and partial modified Mayo score (pMMS; RBS + SFS) were calculated from pt e-diary responses, as well as change from baseline (CFB) during the first 28 days of therapy. Symptomatic responders were pts with ≥ 30% CFB (decrease) in pMMS. Symptomatic remission was defined as pts with RBS=0 plus SFS=0 or 1 (with ≥ 1-point improvement from baseline). RB and SF remission were defined as pts with RBS=0 and SFS=0, respectively. The Mantel–Haenszel weighted test was used to assess the adjusted risk differences in proportions of responders between treatment groups. Results: At baseline, pts receiving etrasimod and PBO had a mean (SD) RBS of 1.6 (0.69) and 1.6 (0.68), SFS of 2.4 (0.74) and 2.4 (0.74), and pMMS of 4.0 (1.07) and 4.0 (1.07), respectively. Adjusted differences in symptomatic response and symptomatic remission in pts receiving etrasimod vs PBO became significant from Day 2 (5.56 [0.79, 10.33]) and Day 11 (4.69 [0.36, 9.03]), respectively. Adjusted differences (95% confidence interval) in RB remission and SF remission in pts receiving etrasimod vs PBO reached significance from Day 15 (6.33 [0.14, 12.51]) and Day 3 (3.51 [0.87, 6.14]), respectively (all P < 0.05; Table 1). Conclusion: In this post hoc analysis of the phase 3 ELEVATE trials, we found significant, early improvements in UC symptoms in pts receiving etrasimod vs PBO beginning within 2 days. These findings indicate a potentially rapid onset of symptomatic effect with etrasimod treatment. Table 1. - Responses in Pts Receiving Etrasimod Compared with PBO on the First Day of a Significant Adjusted Difference in Daily Symptomatic Response, Symptomatic Remission, RB Remission and SF Remission Endpoint First day of significant [a] difference from PBO Pooled data from ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 Adjusted difference (95% CI) [c] 2-sided P value at first day of significant difference from PBO [d] PBO (N=260), n (%) N1 [b] Etrasimod 2 mg QD (N=527), n (%) N1 [b] Daily symptomatic response 2 27 (11.16) 242 84 (16.83) 499 5.56 (0.79, 10.33) 0.022 Daily symptomatic remission 11 21 (8.71) 241 67 (13.59) 493 4.69 (0.36, 9.03) 0.034 Daily RB remission 15 59 (25.21) 234 153 (31.35) 488 6.33 (0.14, 12.51) 0.045 Daily SF remission 3 6 (2.45) 245 31 (6.19) 501 3.51 (0.87, 6.14) 0.009 [a]Adjusted differences with nominal P values < 0.05 were considered significant.[b]N1 was the actual number of pts on each day (responders and nonresponders).[c]Adjusted differences were based on estimated common risk difference using Mantel–Haenszel weights and stratified by actual naïve to biologic/JAKi therapy at study entry (Yes/No), actual baseline corticosteroid use (Yes/No) and actual baseline disease activity (MMS: 4–6 or 7–9).[d]The Mantel–Haenszel weighted test was used to assess the adjusted risk differences in proportions of responders between treatment groups.Data were pooled from NCT03945188 and NCT03996369. Pts missing an assessment at the specified day were considered nonresponders.CI, confidence interval; JAKi, Janus kinase inhibitor; MMS, modified Mayo score; n, number of patients with characteristic; N, number of patients; PBO, placebo; pt, patient; QD, once daily; RB, rectal bleeding; SF, stool frequency; UC, ulcerative colitis. Reference: 1. Sandborn WJ et al. Lancet 2023; 401: 1159-1171.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».