MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4387750968 · doi:10.14309/01.ajg.0000953060.62544.e8

S855 Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) Survey: Burden and Impact of Bowel Urgency is Similar in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis

2023· article· en· W4387750968 sur OpenAlexaff
Stefan Schreiber, Theresa Hunter, Marla C. Dubinsky, David T. Rubin, Remo Panaccione, Toshifumi Hibi∥, Cem Kayhan, Alison Potts Bleakman, Tommaso Panni, Angelo D. Favia, Christian Atkinson, Simon Travis

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueInflammatory Bowel Disease
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineUlcerative colitisInflammatory bowel diseaseGastroenterologyInternal medicineCrohn's diseaseDiseaseCrohn disease

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Although bowel urgency (BU) is known to be disruptive in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC),1 its impact on patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) is unclear. This study aimed to explore the burden and impacts of BU on patients with moderate-to-severe CD compared to previously reported UC data.1 Methods: Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE), an online, quantitative, cross-sectional survey, explores the experiences and impacts of symptoms on lives of patients with CD or UC in the United States (US), Europe (EU5: France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and UK), and Japan.1 Moderate-to-severe CD and UC were defined using criteria based on previous treatment, steroid use, and/or hospitalization. Data from the US and EU5 are presented as descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 2706 patients were contacted, of which 215 US (55% male; mean age: 41 years) and 547 EU5 (55% male, mean age:38 years) patients with CD completed the survey. Of these, 58% US and 63% EU5 patients were receiving advanced therapies at the time of survey completion (Table 1). BU was among the top 3 most common symptoms currently (past month) experienced by US (42%) and EU5 (38%) patients with CD, similar to the findings in patients with UC (Figure 1). Most US and EU5 patients with CD reported experiencing BU and/or BU-related accidents at least once a month in the past 3 months (Table 1). Nearly half of patients with CD (US: 49%, EU5: 40%) reported wearing diaper/pad/protection at least once a week due to fear of BU-related accidents, comparable to patients with UC. For patients receiving advanced therapies, similar patterns were observed (Table 1). As reported in patients with UC, BU and BU-related accidents were among the top 3 most common CD-related reasons for declining participation in social events, work/school, and sports/physical exercise in both US and EU5 patients (Table 1). Conclusion: The impact of BU is as common in patients with moderate-to-severe CD as in those with UC,1 despite the phenotypic differences between the diseases. Even though most patients were young (aged < 55 years) and receiving advanced therapies, almost half of patients reported wearing diaper/pad/protection at least once a week due to fear of BU-related accidents in both US and EU5, demonstrating the impact of BU in patients with CD. Table 1. - Frequency of symptoms and impacts of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis and most common reasons for declining daily activities Symptoms/impacts CD UC US patients, n (%) EU5 patients, n (%) US patients, n (%) EU5 patients, n (%) Frequency of symptoms/impacts in past 3 months Bowel urgency Total number of patients (N)* 126 295 123 250 At least once a week 95 (75.4) 207 (70.2) 97 (78.9) 177 (70.8) Every 2–3 weeks/monthly 25 (19.9) 58 (19.7) 17 (13.9) 45 (18) Less frequently than monthly 2 (1.6) 19 (6.4) 7 (5.7) 19 (7.6) Not in the last 3 months 4 (3.2) 11 (3.7) 2 (1.6) 9 (3.6) Bowel urgency-related accidents Total number of patients (N)† 84 202 90 175 At least once a week 51 (60.7) 90 (44.5) 52 (57.8) 85 (48.6) Every 2–3 weeks/monthly 17 (20.2) 55 (27.2) 25 (27.8) 39 (22.3) Less frequently than monthly 9 (10.7) 30 (14.9) 5 (5.6) 25 (14.3) Not in the last 3 months 7 (8.3) 27 (13.4) 8 (8.9) 26 (14.9) Diaper/pad/other protection use due to fear/anticipation of bowel urgency-related accidents Total number of patients (N) 215 547 200 556 At least once a week 105 (48.8) 216 (39.5) 90 (45.0) 206 (37) Every 2–3 weeks/monthly 36 (16.8) 111 (20.3) 47 (23.5) 155 (27.8) Less frequently than monthly 13 (6.0) 40 (7.3) 15 (7.5) 60 (10.8) Not in the last 3 months 61 (28.4) 180 (32.9) 48 (24.0) 135 (24.3) Frequency of symptoms/impacts among patients receiving advanced therapies§ in past 3 months Bowel urgency Total number of patients (N)** 76 189 91 126 At least once a week 59 (77.6) 131 (69.2) 73 (80.2) 93 (73.8) Every 2–3 weeks/monthly 16 (21.1) 40 (21.2) 12 (13.2) 25 (19.8) Less frequently than monthly 1 (1.3) 9 (4.8) 4 (4.4) 7 (5.6) Not in the last 3 months - 9 (4.8) 2 (2.2) 1 (0.8) Bowel urgency-related accidents Total number of patients (N)†† 48 138 65 90 At least once a week 27 (56.3) 70 (50.8) 42 (64.6) 47 (52.3) Every 2–3 weeks/monthly 11 (22.9) 35 (25.4) 16 (24.7) 24 (26.6) Less frequently than monthly 6 (12.5) 19 (13.8) 3 (4.6) 13 (14.4) Not in the last 3 months 4 (8.3) 14 (10.1) 4 (6.2) 6 (6.7) Diaper/pad/other protection use due to fear/anticipation of bowel urgency-related accidents Total number of patients (N)# 125 347 153 301 At least once a week 64 (51.2) 157 (45.2) 72 (47.1) 115 (38.3) Every 2–3 weeks/monthly 21 (16.8) 76 (21.9) 37 (24.1) 101 (33.5) Less frequently than monthly 5 (4) 17 (4.9) 13 (8.5) 34 (11.3) Not in the last 3 months 35 (28) 97 (28.0) 31 (20.3) 51 (16.9) Top reasons for declining daily activities Total number of patients (N) 215 547 200 556 Participating in work/school (for example, academic, professional work Bowel urgency 83 (38.6) 151 (27.6) 74 (37.0) 151 (27.2) Fear of bowel urgency-related accidents 87 (40.5) 169 (30.9) 84 (42.0) 185 (33.3) Participating in social events (for example meeting with friends or family) Bowel urgency 69 (32.1) 160 (29.3) 86 (43.0) 164 (29.5) Fear of bowel urgency-related accidents 80 (37.2) 156 (28.5) 80 (40.0) 177 (31.8) Participating in sports/physical exercise Bowel urgency 67 (31.2) 141 (25.8) 75 (37.5) 162 (29.1) Fear of bowel urgency-related accidents 84 (39.1) 146 (26.7) 71 (35.5) 156 (28.1) N=Total number of patients, n=number of patients.*Patients who had ever experienced BU.†Patients who had ever experienced BU-related accidents.§Advanced therapies included adalimumab (including biosimilars), infliximab (including biosimilars), golimumab, certolizumab pegol, vedolizumab, natalizumab, ustekinumab, and tofacitinib.**Patients who were receiving advanced therapies who had ever experienced BU.††Patients who were receiving advanced therapies who had ever experienced BU-related accidents.#Patients who were receiving advanced therapies at the time of survey completion.CD: Crohn’s disease, UC: Ulcerative colitis, US: United states of America, EU5: France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Figure 1.: Top 3 symptoms experienced by US and EU5 patients with UC or CD in the past month. CD: Crohn’s disease, UC: Ulcerative colitis, US: United states of America, EU5: France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. 1Rubin DT, et al. Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) Survey: Patient and Healthcare Professional Perspectives on Experience of Ulcerative Colitis Symptoms. 2021;116:p S7.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,012

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,253
Écart entre enseignants0,246 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Même sujetInflammatory Bowel Disease→Travaux en français237 207→