S1066 Sustained Improvement in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire Outcomes in Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis With Continued Mirikizumab Treatment in Phase 3 LUCENT-3 Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Mirikizumab (miri) significantly improved quality of life as evidenced by the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) scores in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) during 12-week (W) induction (LUCENT-1) and 40-W maintenance (LUCENT-2) phase 3 studies.1 IBDQ response and remission rates were significantly higher with miri vs placebo in both studies.1 Here we report interim results of 104-W of continuous miri therapy on IBDQ outcomes from an ongoing open-label, single-arm, phase 3, multicenter, long-term extension study (LUCENT-3/NCT03519945). Methods: Patients who completed LUCENT-2 and achieved clinical response or remission after 52-W of continuous miri therapy entered LUCENT-3 and continued to receive miri 200 mg every 4 weeks subcutaneously. Least squares mean change from baseline in IBDQ total and domain scores were evaluated at W104 using an analysis of covariance model. IBDQ response (≥16-point improvement from baseline)1 and IBDQ remission (IBDQ total score ≥170)1 rates, stratified by prior biologic failure status, were assessed at W104. Missing data were imputed using modified baseline observation carried forward (IBDQ change from baseline) and non-responder imputation (IBDQ response and remission rates). Results: Among the 239 patients with clinical response at W52 who entered the LUCENT-3 study, 154 were in clinical remission. Improvements in IBDQ total and domain scores for these patients were sustained at W104 (Figure 1A). IBDQ response at W104 was seen in over 80% of patients and was comparable across ‘biologic failed’ and ‘not biologic failed’ subgroups (Figure 1B). IBDQ remission rates in the clinical response (78.2%) and clinical remission (80.5%) groups were sustained in ‘not biologic failed’ subgroup (80.1% and 83.2%) and were numerically lower in ‘biologic failed’ subgroup (74.0% and 74.5%), respectively (Figure 1C). Conclusion: In the LUCENT-3 extension study, treatment with mirikizumab showed sustained improvement in quality of life up to W104 in patients with moderately to severely active UC with or without prior biologic failure. 1Sands BE, et al. Mirikizumab improves quality of life in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: improvement in inflammatory bowel disease scores in participants of the LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 induction and maintenance trials. United European Gastroenterol J. 2022;10(S8):778.Figure 1.: IBDQ outcomes at W104 of continuous mirikizumab treatment in patients who achieved clinical responsea or remissionb in LUCENT-2 – mITT population : A) LS mean change from baseline in IBDQ total and domain scores (ANCOVA with mBOCF) ; B) IBDQ response rates (≥16-point improvement from baseline) (NRI); and C) IBDQ remission rates (IBDQ total score ≥170) (NRI) Baseline was defined as the last nonmissing assessment recorded on or prior to the date of the first study drug administration at Week 0 in LUCENT-1 induction study. *Within-treatment change from baseline P<0.001 calculated using ANCOVA. aClinical Responders: Patients who achieved ≥2 points and ≥30% decrease from baseline in MMS and a decrease of ≥1 point in the RB subscore from baseline or an RB score of 0 or 1. bClinical Remitters: Patients who achieved SF subscore = 0 or 1 with ≥1 point decrease from baseline; RB = 0; ES = 0 or 1. cBiologic failed: Inadequate response, loss of response, or intolerant to a biologic therapy or Janus kinase inhibitors for UC. dNot biologic failed: Failed conventional treatments (i.e., immunomodulators/corticosteroids); may include some participants who were exposed to but did not fail biologic treatment. ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; ES, endoscopic subscore; IBDQ, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire; LS, least squares; mBOCF, modified baseline observation carried forward; mITT, modified intent-to-treat; MMS, modified Mayo score; NRI, non-responder imputation; RB, rectal bleeding; SE, standard error; SF, stool frequency.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».