S1195 Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) Survey: Patient and Healthcare Professional Perspectives on Communication Relating to Ulcerative Colitis Symptoms in Canada
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) can be associated with impaired quality of life. The Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) study aims to increase understanding of patients’ experiences and the impact of IBD on their lives and elucidate any communication gaps between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients with moderate-to-severe UC in the United States, Europe, Japan, and Canada. These data focus on Canadian patients and HCPs. Methods: Online, quantitative, cross-sectional survey was conducted (panel recruitment) between February and April 2023 with patients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe UC and gastroenterologists (GIs) in Canada. Active disease of at least moderate severity defined using criteria based on previous treatment, steroid use, and/or hospitalization. HCPs were GIs responsible for making prescribing decisions for patients with moderate-to-severe UC. Results summarised descriptively. Results: Survey completed by 82 (373 contacted) patients (65% male, mean age 43.5 years (SD 12.6), mean time since diagnosis 6.3 years (SD 7.6, range 1-33 years)) and 53 GIs (70 contacted). The top 3 patient-reported symptoms experienced in the past month were diarrhea (39%, n=32), bowel urgency (BU, 30%, n=25), and fatigue/tiredness (29%, n=24). Among patients currently experiencing BU, 36% (n=9) discussed this at every appointment, of those that did not (n=16), 88% would like to discuss this more. 22% of patients (n=10) who have ever suffered from BU did not feel comfortable reporting BU to their GI. 85% (n=45) GIs reported they proactively discuss BU at routine appointments; 73% (n=39) thought their patients were comfortable reporting BU. GIs who reported that they do not proactively discuss BU (15%, n=8) cited the main reasons as expectation for the patient to bring it up and insufficient time (both 62%, n=5). Conclusion: A communication gap related to BU exists between patients and GIs. Most GIs report they proactively discuss BU routinely, but the majority of patients experiencing this would like to discuss it more. Among GIs that do not routinely proactively discuss BU, most believe their patients are comfortable reporting it. Patients who do not routinely discuss it would like to do so more frequently, but do not feel comfortable reporting it to their GI.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle