MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4387788136 · doi:10.1353/eal.2023.a909705

Cayetano Lanuza, Jicotencal 's Author

2023· article· en· W4387788136 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
María Helena Barrera-Agarwal

Notice bibliographique

RevueEarly American literature · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMedical History and Innovations
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPublishingClassicsAttributionHistoryIdentity (music)PhilosophyLiteratureArtPsychologyAesthetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Cayetano Lanuza, Jicotencal's Author María Helena Barrera-Agarwal (bio) keywords Jicotencal, Lanuza, Mendía & Co., Cayetano Lanuza, Joseph Mendía, Frederick Huttner, William Stavely, Pierre-Étienne Du Ponceau, William Cullen Bryant, Charles Folsom, Félix Pascalis-Ouviere, José Luis Casaseca, book printing in Spanish The first historical novel written in Spanish and published in the United States, Jicotencal, appeared in Philadelphia in 1826. The exact circumstances surrounding its publication remained unclear for almost two centuries. This mystery was attributable to two causes: first and foremost, the decision of the author not to include his name in the book, and second, no less important, the attribution of publishing responsibility to the printer of the book, William Stavely. This duality created abundant scholarly conjectures about the identity of the author and that person's exact relationship to Stavely. As academic interest in the novel increased, a number of theories coalesced into three types of attribution used in the novel's twentieth-century editions. Some insisted on the anonymity of the author, whereas others credited authorship to Félix Varela or to José María Heredia, either on the basis of textual comparative analysis, or by appealing to these writers' physical presence in Philadelphia close to or at the time of publication. Influenced by those restrictive methodologies, scholars were not able to solve the question of authorship and publishing responsibility. In 2017, I considered a new approach to the conundrum: the idea was to seek proof about Jicotencal's authorship in two complementary settings: first, by analyzing extant physical copies of the two volumes of the 1826 edition;1 second, by examining secondary sources contemporaneous to the publication and dissemination of the novel, including newspapers and private correspondence. The evidence gleaned from this effort allowed me to establish that Jicotencal was published by the house of Lanuza, Mendía & Co. (hereafter, Lanuza, Mendía), based in New York City, and that its author was one of the partners of the firm, the Spanish physician Cayetano [End Page 675] Lanuza. In 2018, I published the preliminary results of my research in the journal A Contracorriente: Una revista de estudios latinoamericanos (Barrera-Agarwal). This essay updates those findings, adding evidence that further confirms my previous assertions. the publisher: lanuza, mendía A number of copies of Jicotencal are extant, safeguarded in libraries across America and Europe. Three paratextual details of these volumes need to be analyzed: the imprint, the copyright notice and the announcements that appear at the end of the second volume of the book. The first of the announcements advertises that Jicotencal is available at the houses of F. Merino and J. Laval, in Philadelphia, and at the house of Lanuza, Mendía, in New York. The second announcement is even more specific with regard to the latter: it is titled "Libros de fondo que se encuentran en casa de Lanuza Mendía de Nueva York" (Jicotencal; Backlist books found in the house of Lanuza Mendía of New York). At the time of Jicotencal's publication, the expression "libros de fondo" was a term of art among Spanish-speaking publishers. In his Diccionario de la lengua castellana, published in 1846, Vicente Salvá described "libros de fondo" as those books that the bookseller "has printed on his own, or he has purchased a considerable number of copies" (525).2 Three years earlier, Francisco Oliva, one of Barcelona's most important booksellers and publishers, stated that one of his catalogues contained "only the books called de fondo; this is, printed in my house, as it is apparent from the mention of my press and name in the title pages."3 The list of Lanuza, Mendía's "libros de fondo" printed at the end of Jicotencal includes ten books, published between 1825 and 1826. Some of those books bear the name of the firm on the title page, whereas others carry only the imprint of the printing shop in which they were produced. The last title, and the only one printed outside New York City, is Jicotencal (see figure 1). At the end of the announcement there is a section labeled "En Prensa" ("Being Printed")—a detail that no publishing house except...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,485
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,247
Écart entre enseignants0,222 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEarly American literatureMême sujetMedical History and InnovationsTravaux en français237 207