Escape to the City: Fugitive Slaves in the Antebellum Urban South by Viola Franziska Müller (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Escape to the City: Fugitive Slaves in the Antebellum Urban South by Viola Franziska Müller Warren E. Milteer Jr. Escape to the City: Fugitive Slaves in the Antebellum Urban South. By Viola Franziska Müller. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2022. Pp. xiv, 248. Paper, $32.95, ISBN 978-1-4696-7106-2; cloth, $99.00, ISBN 978-1-4696-7105-5.) Viola Franziska Müller’s Escape to the City: Fugitive Slaves in the Antebellum Urban South is a fascinating exploration of the experiences of fugitives from slavery. While most readers may think about the northern United States and Canada when considering the most likely destinations for enslaved people in search of freedom, Müller convincingly demonstrates that the cities of the South were important sites of refuge for countless enslaved persons. She suggests that the visibility of enslaved people who ran north has led us to overlook the important stories of those who remained in the South. After a careful evaluation of the sources, Müller contends that numerous enslaved people prioritized living independent of a master or mistress and that, in many cases, the southern cities could meet this priority. Baltimore, Charleston, Richmond, and New Orleans serve as the primary backdrops for the stories of Müller’s fugitives. In six succinct chapters, Müller guides her readers through the world of slavery’s fugitives. The book’s first chapter explores the motivations of fugitives: why did enslaved people run to the cities of the South? Müller provides multiple explanations, including threat of sale and family separation. The identities of the fugitives are the subject of chapter 2. Who was most likely to become a fugitive? Müller agrees that men made up the majority of fugitives, but she contends that women were more likely to escape bondage than some readers might suspect. Yet she argues that ultimately proximity to “cities of refuge” helped determine who was most likely to go on the run (p. 7). Once there, fugitives found work by exploiting the existing system or taking on the identities of free people. As chapter 3 demonstrates, the presence of a significant population of free people of color was important to urban fugitive populations. The presence of free people of color in a city allowed enslaved people on the run to blend into a community in which all people of color could not be presumed to be slaves. To act free as a person of color in the cities was to some degree normalized. The second half of Escape to the City moves through the trials and tribulations of fugitive life. In chapter 4, Müller investigates the ways fugitives [End Page 742] navigated within cities. Through established social networks, the creation of new ties, and taking advantage of segregated spaces, fugitives integrated themselves into the cities of the South. Even as they succeeded in establishing themselves within the urban South, however, they still faced challenges. Chapter 5 reveals their struggle to find work and make enough money to survive. In some southern cities, employers used racial categorization to exclude certain potential workers, including fugitives. Gendered hiring practices curbed opportunities for enslaved women on the run. Licensing requirements further complicated the realm of possibilities. The book’s final chapter seeks to explain why elites and power brokers permitted southern urban centers to become places of refuge for enslaved persons seeking a little independence. In short, Müller’s answer is money. Fugitives were part of a pool of cheap labor. Escape to the City is an important contribution to the scholarship on slavery, labor, and urban life. Müller’s work is worthy of a wide audience. Warren E. Milteer Jr. George Washington University Copyright © 2023 The Southern Historical Association
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».