MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4387950690 · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000005420

2023 Hope Babette Tang Humanism in Healthcare Essay Contest: Second-Place Medical Student Essay: I See You

2023· article· en· W4387950690 sur OpenAlexaff
Riley Plett

Notice bibliographique

RevueAcademic Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueEmpathy and Medical Education
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Saskatchewan
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHumanismCONTESTHealth carePsychologyMedical educationMedicinePhilosophyPolitical scienceTheologyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

“I see you,” I yearn to exclaim. “Do you see me?” Relationship is exchange. A fluidity of my spirit, my history, my ancestors mingling with yours. Gifting, as in relationship, carries a connotation of commitment. I am committed to you—to seeing you. “They aren’t talking to anyone.” This is frequently the first piece of information I am given about my Indigenous patients. “Difficult to engage,” the progress note reads. I’ve only been on the wards one year, but this is already the motif covering these patient’s charts. “Speak up,” they challenge them. “Tell me what happened.” How can they ask this in the context of yet another institution that has stolen everything? This building and its contents are complicit in the linguicide of sacred tongues. “têniki” I say instead. His countenance blossoms with giddy surprise. “têniki?! You’re Cree?” My heart pounds in the dance now livened. My features are fair like my mother’s, but I proudly tell him, “No, I’m Saulteaux … chi miigwetch.” “I’m Saulteaux,” he says as his eyes glisten. They smile in a hue of deep walnut brown, complimenting his slanted grin. “chi miigwetch,” I firmly press in earnest, hoping my words will extend like a warm hand and imprint on his heart. From then on, our exchanges in the adult psychiatric ward would involve more laughter, less pacing, deeper conversation. He knows. He sees me. He knows I know. That I know of the pain: emotional, mental, physical, and spiritual. It is not merely the sum of the DSM-5 criteria for schizophrenia or methamphetamine use disorder that plagues him. No, when I see his pain, I see the tan skin that also covers my father, simultaneously exposing him. When I see his pain, I see intergenerational trauma. I picture my loved one—a frightened small girl, fearful for her life. She will begin to shake, as I now do, and will never stop. Was there a particular epigenetic switch that flipped in them that remains flipped in us? The mind must be infinitely more complicated than that. Still, I can see the switch’s strand in the mess of a web that forever engulfs us as humans. Bio-psycho-social model, they stress in medical school. Three steps to achieving wellness for our patients. Yet wellness is also infinitely more complicated. “Speak up,” they demand, annoyed now. “Why won’t they answer?” They don’t see it, the resilience in him. To me, it is equally as clear as the pain I see. I’m in awe of the tragically beautiful determinedness that radiates from him. “aniin,” I will softly extend instead. My words will float through the air like the medicinal smoke of sage rises. I see you. I see you in all your pain but also in your mountainous strength. I see the endurance of your ancestors now manifest in your willful disposition toward recovery. I see you. Do you see me? The words will branch forward like the vines of Sky Woman’s strawberries once dove toward the earth. When I started my scientific undergraduate degree, I gently advised myself that humanities and arts would become a side gig—music on the weekends, fictional worlds over the holidays. My scientific aptitudes would be the key to my career as a physician. Obviously. Everybody knew this. Live, breathe, and sleep science. I did that. Then one day, science became medicine and medicine healing. When I first met psychiatry, truly and earnestly shook the hand of the vocation that had been beckoning to me, it began to click. Psychiatry was going to require all of me. It would require the resilience instilled in me by my ancestors. “You are a bridge,” my relatives encouraged me. “Our ancestors prayed that you would one day be here.” It would require sitting in the sharp and radiating pain of piano’s A-minor chord reverberating within me. It would require embracing the briefest apnea I experience at the end of immersion within a beautiful novel. It would require my creative brain composed of clay to join in concert with my methodical brain of steadfast stone. To see the human body as more than machine. Yes, the heart is a pump, and our neurons entangle one another in electrical circuits. Medicine, however, transcends the physiological being. What are bones without aspirations? What is the brain without dreaming? There must be a reason we experience the sound waves of “Good morning,” from a loved one as a soft symphony of belonging. Or that we experience the light waves of the setting sun as engrossing theater, alive with flaming tongues of fire. We are all connected. To one another. To creation and Creator. The Great Mystery. giche manidoo. This ancient truth long predates modern medicine with its fMRI scanners and histopathology tirelessly trying to unlock the puzzle of human consciousness. So “aniin,” my brother. My friend. My kindred spirit. I see you. Do you see me?2023 Hope Babette Tang Humanism in Healthcare Essay Contest The Arnold P. Gold Foundation holds an annual essay contest to encourage medical and nursing students to reflect on their experiences and engage in narrative writing. The contest began in 1999 open to medical students and expanded in 2018 to include nursing students. Students are asked to respond to a specific prompt in a 1,000-word essay. For the 2023 contest, students were asked to use the following quote as inspiration to illuminate how the human connection can make a meaningful difference in care. “I want to give you something, or I want to take something from you. But I want to feel the exchange, the warm hand on the shoulder, the song coming out and the ear holding onto it.” —Excerpt from the poem “How Far Away We Are” by Ada Limón, U.S. Poet Laureate More than 530 essays were submitted. A distinguished panel of judges, including esteemed healthcare professionals and notable authors, reviewed the submissions. Three winning essays from medical students and three winning essays from nursing students were selected, along with 11 honorable mentions. Academic Medicine partners with the Arnold P. Gold Foundation to publish selected essays, which exemplify the journal’s commitment to the value of humanism in healthcare. The winning essays will be published in consecutive issues of Academic Medicine and the Journal of Professional Nursing in the fall/winter of 2023. The contest is named for Hope Babette Tang-Goodwin, MD, who was an assistant professor of pediatrics and an exemplar of humanism in healthcare. Her approach to medicine combined a boundless enthusiasm for her work, intellectual rigor, and deep compassion for her patients. The Arnold P. Gold Foundation is a nonprofit organization that champions humanism in healthcare, defined as compassionate, collaborative, and scientifically excellent care. This Gold standard of care embraces all and targets barriers to such care. The Gold Foundation empowers experts, learners, and leaders to together create systems and cultures that support humanistic care for all. Learn more at www.gold-foundation.org.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,039
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,129

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,011
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0120,008
Communication savante0,0110,006
Science ouverte0,0010,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0120,016
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0390,012

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,039
Tête enseignante GPT0,397
Écart entre enseignants0,358 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAcademic Medicine→Même sujetEmpathy and Medical Education→Travaux en français237 207→