Robust Supply Chain Design for Highly-Customized Manufacturing
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Customers in today's evolving markets are seeking options that best suit their specific needs; consequently, the demand for highly-customized and personalized products has been growing steadily.In order to facilitate customized manufacturing, the structure of the underlying supply chain (SC) needs to be enhanced in terms of flexibility and resilience.In this study, we consider an SC comprising a main manufacturer that produces custom-designed modularstructured products, featured with different design complexity levels.The products have a bill-of-material (BOM) that can be altered in terms of the design of a subset of sub-assemblies and components.It is further assumed that the company collaborates with a group of manufacturers and part suppliers (upstream SC entities), differentiated in terms of capacity, technological capabilities, and cost, along with a group of logistics carriers (downstream entities) distinguished in the sense of their cost and lead time.In other words, in addition to involving customers in the product design, the company also provides different modes of product delivery (e.g., fast, regular, and slow) offered by different logistics carriers.We also incorporate the uncertainty involved in the manufacturing of subassemblies and parts featured with complex designs.More specifically, to reflect the amount of effort required to manufacture complex designs, the production and procurement costs of (highly or moderately complex) items are considered as piece-wise linear functions of their order quantity.Furthermore, the manufacturing capability of upstream entities for producing complex items are assumed uncertain, and modeled as scenarios.More precisely, under some scenarios, the producers/suppliers will not be capable of fulfilling the order of highly/moderately complex items within the promised production lead time due to technological limitations.To obtain the optimal configuration of the above-mentioned SC, we first develop a deterministic mixed-integer programming (MIP) model that seeks the optimal choice of sub-assembly producers, part suppliers, and logistics carriers in addition to the optimal quantity of procurement, production, and transportation at different echelons.The objective is to minimize the total manufacturing, transportation, and lost-sale cost.Afterward, in order to incorporate the uncertain technological capabilities of producers/suppliers, the above MIP model is reformulated as a two-stage stochastic program (2-SP).In this model, three types of corrective (recourse) actions are considered in order to compensate for the incapability of producers/suppliers in the manufacturing of complex products.These actions correspond to resorting to backup suppliers/producers; purchasing sub-assemblies and components from the open market; and lost-sale, in case none of the first two actions are feasible.Obviously, the cost of all recourse actions mentioned above is substantially higher than the cost of the initial assignment of producers/suppliers that must be set prior to receive full insight in terms of suppliers' capabilities.We explore a sample average approximation (SAA) scheme to solve the 2-stage stochastic MIP model under different scenario sets.In-depth computational experiments are conducted to validate the proposed models and solution algorithm while showcasing the value of incorporating uncertainty into the SC design problem.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».