MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4388115827 · doi:10.36001/phmconf.2023.v15i1.3517

Ensemble Learning Based Convolutional Neural Networks for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Aircraft Engines

2023· article· en· W4388115827 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnnual Conference of the PHM Society · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueAdvanced Sensor Technologies Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Waterloo
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPrognosticsConvolutional neural networkComputer scienceTurbofanArtificial intelligenceEnsemble learningDeep learningMachine learningHyperparameterArtificial neural networkFunction (biology)Feature (linguistics)Data miningEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Remaining useful life (RUL) prediction is an essential task of Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) of aircraft engines performed utilizing the huge data collected from multiple sensors attached to them to ensure their safe operation. While many studies have been reported on RUL prediction for aircraft engines, only a few of them focus on ensemble learning of CNN models for RUL prediction. The success of ensemble learning which is a combination of several base models developed using either same or different machine learning or deep learning algorithms, critically depends on the diversity among the base models generated. This paper proposes a new data-driven approach for RUL prediction of aircraft engines using ensemble learning based convolution neural networks (CNN) by investigating various steps to generate more diverse base models. The main objectives and contributions of this paper are as follows: Explore various CNN model architectures for RUL prediction - After data preprocessing and exploratory data analysis, two different CNN approaches, namely 2D CNN and 1D CNN with multiple channels, are investigated employing time window approach for time-series input preparation for better feature extraction by CNN. Each approach is experimented with multiple architectures to achieve the best possible outcome. Investigate engine specific RUL target function - For RUL prediction of turbofan engines using the C-MAPSS dataset, typically two RUL target functions, namely linear and piecewise linear, are used to determine RUL target values. In the piecewise linear RUL target function approach, which yields better performance in the reported studies, the RUL target value is assigned based on a piecewise linear degradation model which assumes a constant (and maximum) RUL target value in the early phase before linearly degrading the RUL targets. In the literature, this maximum RUL target value was chosen same for all the engines by taking a value of 125 or 130 without providing proper rationale. In this study, we adopt an approach based on the widely known health index to determine an engine specific initial (and maximum) RUL target value that can be used with the piecewise linear degradation model to determine RUL target values. Investigate hyperparameter optimization of CNN models to generate diverse base models - For the purpose of developing a high performance ensemble CNN model for RUL prediction, hyperparameter optimization of CNN models is performed to optimally determine the network structure (such as # of filters, filter size, stride, padding, # of convolutional, pooling, and dense layers, activation functions etc.) as well as the hyperparameters that determine the network training process (such as optimization method, learning rate, momentum, batch size etc.). Investigate ensemble learning to select and combine diverse CNN models for RUL prediction – In order to develop model combiners, diverse CNN models as base learners are selected using multiple performance measures such as RMSE, score function, MAE, and R2 score, and employing the non-negative least squares method, random forest regression, and extreme learning machine (ELM) to train model combiners. Evaluate the above proposed approach using the C-MAPSS dataset - To show the effectiveness of the proposed approach, various evaluations for RUL prediction using the popular C-MAPSS dataset (including all the four sub-datasets denoted as FD001, FD002, FD003 and FD004) are carried out and the results will be compared against the state-of-the-art results on the same dataset. Major emphasis of this proposed approach is on the generation of diverse CNN base models by carrying out various steps as explained above, and it is expected the results of this proposed approach will contribute towards enhancing the RUL prediction performance especially on the sub-datasets FD002 and FD004 which are challenging for the existing state-of-the-art RUL prediction techniques.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,258
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,434

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,046
Tête enseignante GPT0,265
Écart entre enseignants0,219 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle