Consuming patients’ days: Time spent on ambulatory visits by persons with cancer.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
324 Background: Health care-related time burdens faced by persons with cancer can be substantial. In qualitative work, patients report that ‘’seemingly short clinic visits (e.g., a supposed 10-minute blood draw) often turn into all-day affairs.” We sought to estimate the total time spent (home-to-home) by patients with cancer on ambulatory services at an urban cancer center. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all patients with cancer scheduled for any ambulatory care (e.g., laboratory testing, imaging, procedures, infusions, clinician visits) at a Midwestern academic cancer center during a randomly selected week (Monday-Friday) in January 2023. We extracted sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, and services received from the electronic medical record. The primary exposure was the ambulatory care type or combination received by a patient on a day (e.g., clinician visit only, labs and infusion, etc.). Using data from the Real-Time Location System (RTLS) badge that patients wear from clinic entry to exit (standard of care to optimize clinic workflow), we tracked time spent in each patient location (e.g., exam room) and in the clinic overall. We estimated round-trip travel times using home and clinic zip codes and SAS/Google Maps. We calculated median parking time by directly observing 20 random patients between the clinic and their vehicles (e.g., parking ramp or valet). We calculated and summarized clinic and total (clinic + travel + parking) times for different ambulatory care types. Results: We analyzed 468 encounters by 436 unique patients (median age, 64 years, 52% women, 82% white race, 19% breast cancer). Median (IQR) clinic time per encounter was 118 (76-200) minutes. The median (IQR) round-trip driving distance and travel time was 33 (21-53) miles and 50 (36-68) minutes. The median parking time was 8 (6-10) minutes. The median (IQR) total time was 189 (136-277) minutes. Table 1 presents the times by type(s) of ambulatory services. Conclusions: In this single-center retrospective study, pursuing ambulatory cancer care on a given day required patients (and their accompanying care partners) to commit several hours to their care. These findings highlight the need to decrease care time demands on patients to mitigate time toxicity. Accounting for opportunity time costs and the coordination of other daily activities around ambulatory care, these results support our previously proposed practical measure of the time burdens of cancer care—that any day with in-person healthcare contact may represent a ‘’lost day.”[Table: see text]
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».