The HEARTS ECG workshop: a novel approach to resident and student ECG education
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVES: ECG interpretation is a life-saving skill in emergency medicine (EM), and a core competency in undergraduate medical curricula; however, confidence for residents/students is low. We developed a novel educational intervention-the HEARTS ECG workshop-that provides a systematic approach to ECG interpretation, teaches EM residents through the process of teaching medical students and highlights emergency management. METHODS: We used the Kern Approach to Curriculum Development. A review of ECG education literature and a targeted needs assessment of local students/residents led to goals and objectives including systematic ECG interpretation with clinical relevance. ECGs were selected based on a national consensus of EM program directors and categorized into 5 common emergency presentations. The educational strategy included content based on HEARTS approach (Heart rate/rhythm, Electrical conduction, Axis, R-wave progression, Tall/small voltages, and ST/T changes), and methods including flipped classroom and near-peer teaching. Evaluation and feedback were based on the Kirkpatrick program evaluation. The workshop was piloted with 6 junior EM residents and 58 medical students, and repeated with nine residents and 68 students from four medical schools. RESULTS: Residents and students agreed or strongly agreed that the workshop improved their perceived ability (100% and 95%, respectively) and confidence (77% and 88%, respectively) in interpreting ECGs. Reports of ECG interpretation causing anxiety declined from pre-workshop (61% and 83% respectively) to post-workshop (38% and 37% respectively). Residents reported behavior change: 3 months after the workshop, 92.3% reported ongoing use of the HEARTS approach clinically and through teaching medical students on shifts. Reported workshop strengths included the pre-workshop material, the clinical application, facilitator-to-learner ratio, interactivity, the ease of remembering and applying the HEARTS mnemonic, and the iterative application of the approach. Suggested changes included longitudinal sessions with graded difficulty, and allocating more time for introductory material for ease of understanding. CONCLUSION: The HEARTS ECG workshop is an innovative pedagogical method that can be adapted for all levels of training. Future directions include integration in undergraduate medical and EM residency curricula, and workshops for physicians to update ECG interpretation skills.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».