Greening Development Co‑operation: Sweden Report
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
It will not be possible to deliver the holistic 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the sustainable development goals without managing environmental opportunities and challenges.Development is a trifecta of economic, social and environmental dimensions; it cannot be achieved if any of the three dimensions are weak.This reality -recalled by daily headlines about the Amazon burning and other environmental crises -is prompting a shift towards sustainable development co-operation at all levels.The OECD Development Co-operation Directorate (DCD) is supporting this transformation among Development Assistance Committee (DAC) members who have had a strong focus in recent years on the climate crisis and the importance of greening economies.We will not achieve the 2030 Agenda if we do not meet the goals for a climate-resilient, low-emissions future.At the same time, we cannot ignore the threats posed by loss of biodiversity, desertification, pressure on natural resources and the impact of pollution on the environment and, particularly, on human health.Greening Development Co-operation: Lessons from the OECD Development Assistance Committee responds to a key challenge facing many of our members -how to integrate environment issues into development co-operation strategies and programmes so that we go beyond doing no harm to the environment, and ensure that we take every opportunity to do good.It explores five key dimensions of development co-operation.First, is the need for strong policy commitment and leadership in development co-operation.Second, the importance of robust systems, processes and tools to ensure that environmental issues and environmental impacts are considered throughout the project/programme cycle.A third requirement is for capacity and continuous skill development of staff and partners.The fourth element focuses on the necessity of sharing knowledge, learning and engaging all stakeholders.Finally, it is essential that country partners are well-supported and that their needs are centre stage.These dimensions form the five building blocks for greening development co-operation.The second in a series of thematic reviews launched by the DAC to increase peer-to-peer learning, this peer-learning report on environment mainstreaming has been a resounding success.It was grounded in a clear framework for analysis that reflected the needs and interests of DAC members for a review that was both policy and operationally relevant.Going forward, the DCD will continue to support the DAC, and its Network on Environment and Development Co-operation (ENVIRONET) will continue to engage with members and others on the challenges and opportunities for environment mainstreaming, and highlight and promote good practice through DAC peer reviews.The DAC will also support further peer-to-peer learning among members, recognising the valuable contribution that such opportunities present to improve approaches to development co-operation and, ultimately, realising better results.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».