Standing on the Shoulders of Giant Artificial Intelligence Bots: Artificial Intelligence Can and Therefore Must Now Elevate Equity in Health Professional Education
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Newton unashamedly and accurately wrote, “If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.1” Similarly, giant Artificial Intelligence (AI) bots can now elevate and telescope everyone's vision through the web accumulation of those giants’ knowledge and computer scientists’ provision of access to that knowledge. This turns the creation of powerful and accessible AI into an ethical mandate, especially for health professions education. As we approach the technological singularity, it is crucial to address the diverse range of AI risks, from academic dishonesty to the potential for catastrophic international conflicts. However, we should not allow these challenges to divert our attention from the incredible opportunity to foster education equity through innovation.2, 3 Such success in AI-elevated equity is indeed achievable, and is a clear new frontier in Preventive Medicine. AI programs have the potential to offer affordable and scalable solutions in various domains, such as assisting struggling readers in achieving literacy, accurately interpreting diagnostic studies, or making therapeutic information available in under-resourced settings. By overcoming the barriers of cost and limited availability of traditional treatments, and increasing the capacity of healthcare professionals, these programs enable greater access to quality services in education and healthcare. Health Professions Education (HPE) leaders worldwide facilitated a nearly overnight and universal shift to digital/online education during the pandemic. Many educators have become more conversant with using online and digital technologies. The sector is primed for adopting responsible AI tools that promote equity, particularly in low-resource settings with few or no alternatives. HPE withstood the rush to the market of online tools during the pandemic, so having weathered that storm, it is time for a measured, efficient, and just shift to the integrated use of AI technologies.4 Specialists in Preventive Medicine and others interested in the UN Sustainable Development Goals must recognize that access to equitable, high-quality online education is obstructed by the difficulty of scaling evaluations of student writing and personalizing learning content for individual students.5 Both of these barriers can now be significantly reduced by artificial intelligence. Many learning institutions now use standardized tests with an analytical writing portion graded by artificial intelligence6 alongside human graders. The cost of this evaluative technology will likely decrease rapidly as its effectiveness increases, accompanied by risk-mitigating and cost-reduced enhanced monitoring technologies to reduce cheating and plagiarism. Learning opportunities can also be maximized through endlessly customizable and scalable content-specific bots that move students through the material while constantly checking knowledge acquisition and presenting students with additional highly customized learning opportunities as needed. Education-specific tutor bots have the potential to enhance equity in learning environments characterized by excessively high student-to-faculty ratios, and for those with disabilities or special needs. There are many additional ways in which AI can increase equity in Prevention and in Health Professional Education, including:•Educators can use low-cost or open-access AI tools in low-resource settings to reduce the burden of learning activity creation. Many of these tools are readily available via the internet.•AI applications can be tailored to the needs of diverse student populations. Organizations can gain deeper insights into the unique needs of their students and provide access to the most appropriate learning resources.•AI on a smartphone or laptop offers compelling opportunities for educational leapfrogging in low-resource settings, allowing students to access personalized, data-driven instruction often without traveling, while avoiding serious security risks, and removing economic walls for many.•AI can create virtual simulations of clinical and other scenarios that provide students with low-risk (to learners, patients, and institutions), low-cost, infinitely repeatable and variable, real-world experiences.•It can also provide diagnostic and treatment guidance to students, helping them make better decisions and improve patient outcomes.7•AI can monitor and assess student progress throughout a program, providing early intervention and support, particularly important in settings with high student-to-faculty ratios.•AI can analyze locally collected public health and patient data, providing valuable insights into poor health outcomes, enabling accurate and efficient assessment of knowledge and curricular gaps for the development of targeted education interventions that address unique student needs in their specific, local context.•AI can reach neglected institutionalized persons in jails, nursing homes, and mental health facilities•AI can decrease burnout for HPE faculty by reducing the workload associated with administrative and other delegable tasks.4 Competencies for preventionists8 and professional health educators can act as a road map for identifying appropriate learning resources,9 and can be gathered into a data set for integration into an AI tutoring application for students. Responsible AI requires transparent and accessible data sets10 and transparent processes for training AI models. To increase equity in HPE, high-quality data sets and appropriate interdisciplinary teams must be accountable to the public and available to review the work of AI programmers.11 There are important considerations that should be taken into account when utilizing AI applications in learning environments. When using AI applications in the learning environment, educators must learn, model, and teach new roles. They must critically evaluate an AI application for its appropriateness for clinical use and interpret the AI application's abilities in order to understand and mitigate sources of bias or error. The educator must also develop skills in communicating the outputs of the AI application, as well as explain the process whereby the application arrived at its outputs. Health professions educators and students bear the responsibility of safeguarding patient data and maintaining trust between healthcare providers and patients. In addition, they play a vital role in advocating for patients' rights and in promoting the use of responsible and ethical AI systems that uphold them.4, 12 The advent of AI in educational settings should bring eagerness and relief, not just fear. It is time for a paradigm shift in how HPE and preventive medical knowledge are conceptualized and delivered.4,8 Advanced technologies that can dramatically reduce barriers to high-quality, scaled prevention/HPE must be safe, transparently developed, and fairly priced or open-sourced – and the tools for customizing them must be understandable and accessible for all health professions educators.8,13,14 In striving for educational equity through innovation, let us remember Newton's axiom and join him on the giants’ shoulders, leveraging the power of AI to propel us further into a future of transformative and accessible health professions education. 1Chen, C. On the Shoulders of Giants. In: Mapping Scientific Frontiers: The Quest for Knowledge Visualization. Springer, London. 20032Zielinski C, Winker M, Aggarwal R, Ferris L, Heinemann M, Lapeña JF, Pai S, Citrome L. Chatbots, ChatGPT, and Scholarly Manuscripts WAME Recommendations on ChatGPT and Chatbots in Relation to Scholarly Publications. Afro-Egyptian Journal of Infectious and Endemic Diseases. 2023 Jan 29.3Ground-zero.khm.de. War with Artificial Intelligence [Internet]. https://ground-zero.khm.de/war-with-artificial-intelligence/4Lomis K, Jeffries P, Palatta A, Sage M, Sheikh J, Sheperis C, Whelan A. Artificial intelligence for health professions educators. NAM perspectives. 2021; 2021.5United Nations, The 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals: An opportunity for Latin America and the Caribbean (LC/G. 2681-P/Rev.6Ramesh D, Sanampudi SK. An automated essay scoring systems: a systematic literature review. Artificial Intelligence Review. 2022 Mar; 55(3):2495-527.7Gorges, M., Caftan, G., & Topologic, S. How artificial intelligence can contribute to better health systems. World Bank Blogs. 2021, Nov 18.8Frank E. 1991. Osler was wrong: you are a preventionist. American Journal of Preventive Medicine; 7:128.9Frenk J, Chen LC, Chandran L, Groff EO, King R, Meleis A, Fineberg HV. Challenges and opportunities for educating health professionals after the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet. 2022 Oct 29; 400(10362):1539-56.10Researchers use open-source software to improve COVID-19 screening with AI | Waterloo News. 2020, March 24.11Lopez D, Rico-Olarte C, Blobel B, Hullin C. Challenges and solutions for transforming health ecosystems in low-and middle-income countries through artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Medicine. 2022 Jan 1; 9.12McCoy LG, Nagaraj S, Morgado F, Harish V, Das S, Celi LA. What do medical students actually need to know about artificial intelligence? NPJ digital medicine. 2020 Jun 19; 3(1):86.13Harish KB, Price WN, Aphinyanaphongs Y. Open-Source Clinical Machine Learning Models: Critical Appraisal of Feasibility, Advantages, and Challenges. JMIR Formative Research. 2022 Apr 11; 6(4):e33970.14Ciecierski-Holmes T, Singh R, Axt M, Brenner S, Barteit S. Artificial intelligence for strengthening healthcare systems in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review. npj Digital Medicine. 2022 Oct 28;5(1):162. Miriam Chickering: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. Erica Frank: Writing – review & editing. Arthur Caplan: Writing – review & editing.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».